These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26822152)

  • 1. Can the self become another? Investigating the effects of self-association with a new facial identity.
    Payne S; Tsakiris M; Maister L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jun; 70(6):1085-1097. PubMed ID: 26822152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial identity and facial expression are initially integrated at visual perceptual stages of face processing.
    Fisher K; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 80():115-125. PubMed ID: 26581627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming with threatening faces modulates the self-face advantage by enhancing the other-face processing rather than suppressing the self-face processing.
    Guan L; Qi M; Li H; Hitchman G; Yang J; Liu Y
    Brain Res; 2015 May; 1608():97-107. PubMed ID: 25765156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identity-level representations affect unfamiliar face matching performance in sequential but not simultaneous tasks.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1777-93. PubMed ID: 25686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG evidence of face-specific visual self-representation.
    Miyakoshi M; Kanayama N; Iidaka T; Ohira H
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 50(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 20079852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity.
    Sforza A; Bufalari I; Haggard P; Aglioti SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 19813138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can gaze-contingent mirror-feedback from unfamiliar faces alter self-recognition?
    Estudillo AJ; Bindemann M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):944-958. PubMed ID: 26982263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactive processes in matching identity and expressions of unfamiliar faces: evidence for mutual facilitation effects.
    Levy Y; Bentin S
    Perception; 2008; 37(6):915-30. PubMed ID: 18686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterisation of the sympathetic skin response evoked by own-face recognition in healthy subjects.
    Bagnato S; Boccagni C; Prestandrea C; Galardi G
    Funct Neurol; 2010; 25(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 20923607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognizing identity in the face of change: the development of an expression-independent representation of facial identity.
    Mian JF; Mondloch CJ
    J Vis; 2012 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 22847806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-rigid, but not rigid, motion interferes with the processing of structural face information in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Maguinness C; Newell FN
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():281-95. PubMed ID: 25737056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for view-invariant face recognition units in unfamiliar face learning.
    Etchells DB; Brooks JL; Johnston RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):874-889. PubMed ID: 27809666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The other in me: interpersonal multisensory stimulation changes the mental representation of the self.
    Tajadura-Jiménez A; Grehl S; Tsakiris M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40682. PubMed ID: 22866177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the motion advantage: evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion.
    Butcher N; Lander K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 26822035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of adaptor duration on 8-year-olds' facial identity aftereffects suggests adult-like plasticity of the face norm.
    Nishimura M; Robertson C; Maurer D
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(11):1216-22. PubMed ID: 21447354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.