159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26822181)
1. Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights.
Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Chan KY; Drasgow F; Williams B
Multivariate Behav Res; 2001 Oct; 36(4):523-62. PubMed ID: 26822181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further Empirical Results on Parametric Versus Non-Parametric IRT Modeling of Likert-Type Personality Data.
Maydeu-Olivares A
Multivariate Behav Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):261-79. PubMed ID: 26760109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
Vispoel WP; Kim HY
Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new class of parametric IRT models for dichotomous item scores.
Hessen DJ
J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(4):385-97. PubMed ID: 15496746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling.
Meijer RR; Baneke JJ
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of three polytomous item response theory models in the context of testlet scoring.
Cook KF; Dodd BG; Fitzpatrick SJ
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10063769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple-choice tests: polytomous IRT models misestimate item information.
García-Pérez MA
Span J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 17():E88. PubMed ID: 26054359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models.
Sheu CF; Chen CT; Su YH; Wang WC
Behav Res Methods; 2005 May; 37(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 16171193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two strategies for fitting real data to Rasch polytomous models.
Rojas Tejada AJ; Gonzalez Gomez A; Padilla Garcia JL; Perez Melendez C
J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 12011498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confirmatory factor analysis of the M5-50: an implementation of the International Personality Item Pool item set.
Socha A; Cooper CA; McCord DM
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20230150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?
Ling Y; Zhang M; Locke KD; Li G; Li Z
J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 26421444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal?
Tay L; Drasgow F; Rounds J; Williams BA
J Appl Psychol; 2009 Sep; 94(5):1287-304. PubMed ID: 19702371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models.
Scherbaum CA; Sabet J; Kern MJ; Agnello P
J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 23030769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using Bayesian Nonparametric Item Response Function Estimation to Check Parametric Model Fit.
Wang W; Kingston N
Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):331-345. PubMed ID: 32879534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unidimensional 12-item Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview for the assessment of dementia caregivers' burden obtained by item response theory.
Ballesteros J; Santos B; González-Fraile E; Muñoz-Hermoso P; Domínguez-Panchón AI; Martín-Carrasco M
Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1141-7. PubMed ID: 23244818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.
Safrit MJ; Cohen AS; Costa MG
Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Item-level assessment of the irritable bowel syndrome quality of life questionnaire in patients with diarrheal irritable bowel syndrome.
Andrae DA; Covington PS; Patrick DL
Clin Ther; 2014 May; 36(5):663-79. PubMed ID: 24813429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Lim H; Wells CS
Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 44(7-8):563-565. PubMed ID: 34565935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An item analysis of the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression.
DeSimone JA; James LR
J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1872-86. PubMed ID: 26011720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
