These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26822181)

  • 21. How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items?
    Reise SP; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Jun; 8(2):164-84. PubMed ID: 12924813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires.
    Thalmayer AG; Saucier G; Eigenhuis A
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):995-1009. PubMed ID: 21859221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asymptotically Correct Standardization of Person-Fit Statistics Beyond Dichotomous Items.
    Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):992-1013. PubMed ID: 25953476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of Asymmetric IRT Modeling to Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice Test Items.
    Bolt DM; Lee S; Wollack J; Eckerly C; Sowles J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2175. PubMed ID: 30483187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Dec; 63(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 7844738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Validation study of the French schizotypal personality questionnaire in a sample of adolescents: a confirmatory factor analysis].
    Badoud D; Chanal J; Van der Linden M; Eliez S; Debbané M
    Encephale; 2011 Sep; 37(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 21981891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Barthel Index of activities of daily living: item response theory analysis of ratings for long-term care residents.
    Liu W; Unick J; Galik E; Resnick B
    Nurs Res; 2015; 64(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 25738620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Item-Weighted Likelihood Method for Measuring Growth in Longitudinal Study With Tests Composed of Both Dichotomous and Polytomous Items.
    Xue X; Lu J; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():580015. PubMed ID: 34385940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factor analytic approaches to personality item-level data.
    Panter AT; Swygert KA; Grant Dahlstrom W; Tanaka JS
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Jun; 68(3):561-89. PubMed ID: 16372867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian Modal Estimation of the Four-Parameter Item Response Model in Real, Realistic, and Idealized Data Sets.
    Waller NG; Feuerstahler L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 28306347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calibrating the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examination Part I using an integrated item response theory framework: a comparison of models and designs.
    De Champlain AF; Boulais AP; Dallas A
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26883811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of the Self-assessment of Communication Competence (SACCom) in Brazilian Portuguese Through Item Response Theory.
    Ribeiro VV; Santos MADC; de Almeida AAF; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36088205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A primer on standardized testing:
    Himelfarb I
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Oct; 33(2):151-163. PubMed ID: 31169998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Calibrating Items Using an Unfolding Model of Item Response Theory: The Case of the Trait Personality Questionnaire 5 (TPQue5).
    Mitropoulou EM; Zampetakis LA; Tsaousis I
    Eval Rev; 2023 Dec; ():193841X231223374. PubMed ID: 38146227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment.
    Fraley RC; Waller NG; Brennan KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Feb; 78(2):350-65. PubMed ID: 10707340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Note on the
    Dimitrov DM; Luo Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):545-557. PubMed ID: 31105322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.