These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26822671)

  • 1. Confidence intervals for correlations when data are not normal.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):294-309. PubMed ID: 26822671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymptotic confidence intervals for the Pearson correlation via skewness and kurtosis.
    Bishara AJ; Li J; Nash T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):167-185. PubMed ID: 28872186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1101-14. PubMed ID: 11272750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing Bias and Error in the Correlation Coefficient Due to Nonnormality.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):785-804. PubMed ID: 29795841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):399-417. PubMed ID: 22563845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fisher transformation based confidence intervals of correlations in fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis.
    Welz T; Doebler P; Pauly M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Feb; 75(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 33934346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation coefficient inference on censored bioassay data.
    Li L; Wang WW; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 15920894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo based statistical power analysis for mediation models: methods and software.
    Zhang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1184-98. PubMed ID: 24338601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indirect Effects in Sequential Mediation Models: Evaluating Methods for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Formation.
    Tofighi D; Kelley K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):188-210. PubMed ID: 31179751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for the mean of diagnostic test charge data containing zeros.
    Zhou XH; Tu W
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1118-25. PubMed ID: 11129469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the robustness of linear mixed models.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):873-9. PubMed ID: 23299397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.