These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26822868)

  • 1. Using Key Distance to Clarify a Theory on the SNARC.
    Schiller F; Eloka O; Franz VH
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):196-221. PubMed ID: 26822868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SNARC Effect in Different Effectors.
    Hesse PN; Fiehler K; Bremmer F
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):180-95. PubMed ID: 26562877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.
    Hartmann M; Gashaj V; Stahnke A; Mast FW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1401-14. PubMed ID: 24749934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
    Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numbers around Descartes: A preregistered study on the three-dimensional SNARC effect.
    Aleotti S; Di Girolamo F; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104111. PubMed ID: 31731115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reciprocity of spatial-numerical associations of vocal response codes depends on stimulus mode.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):944-964. PubMed ID: 38270776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid communication The mental number line dominates alternative, explicit coding of number magnitude.
    Dollman J; Levine WH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 26445276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Cutini S; Scarpa F; Scatturin P; Dell'Acqua R; Zorzi M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):444-51. PubMed ID: 23081883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
    Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect.
    Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; Dehaene S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1484-99. PubMed ID: 24571534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
    Hesse PN; Bremmer F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations.
    Pfister R; Schroeder PA; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23647378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.
    Deng Z; Chen Y; Zhu X; Li Y
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):428-441. PubMed ID: 27909981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond the SNARC effect: distance-number mapping occurs in the peripersonal space.
    Chen YH; Zhou JF; Yeh SL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 May; 233(5):1519-28. PubMed ID: 25694245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.