347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26823021)
1. T2* relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Wu LM; Zhou B; Lu Q; Suo ST; Liu Q; Hu J; Haccke EM; Chen XX; Xu JR
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 26823021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.
Rosenkrantz AB; Sigmund EE; Johnson G; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Lee VS; Jensen JH
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization.
Yağci AB; Ozari N; Aybek Z; Düzcan E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Jun; 17(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 20694948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer.
Haider MA; van der Kwast TH; Tanguay J; Evans AJ; Hashmi AT; Lockwood G; Trachtenberg J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Aug; 189(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 17646457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Liu M; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):813-7. PubMed ID: 21586608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Luo X; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 23892233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park JJ; Park BK
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150470. PubMed ID: 26653866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kong X; Niver BE; Berkman DS; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21178056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with equivocal findings on T2-weighted imaging.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):W168-75. PubMed ID: 25615777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results.
Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):842-7. PubMed ID: 18007156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The value of relaxation time quantitative technique from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and invasion assessment of prostate cancer].
Song N; Wang T; Zhang D; Wang Z; Zhang SR; Yu J; Cai L; Ma AL; Zhang Q; Chen ZQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 102(15):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 35436808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
Rosenkrantz AB; Khalef V; Xu W; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Doshi AM
Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.
Vargas HA; Akin O; Franiel T; Mazaheri Y; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Udo K; Eastham J; Hricak H
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Analysis of Prostate Multiparametric MR Images for Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in the Peripheral Zone: A Multiple Imager Study.
Hoang Dinh A; Melodelima C; Souchon R; Lehaire J; Bratan F; Mège-Lechevallier F; Ruffion A; Crouzet S; Colombel M; Rouvière O
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26859255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
