334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26824212)
1. Individualised headband simulation test for predicting outcome after percutaneous bone conductive implantation.
Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Biagini M; Lazzarino AI; Barbara M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2015 Oct; 35(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 26824212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant.
Sprinzl G; Toner J; Koitschev A; Berger N; Keintzel T; Rasse T; Baumgartner WD; Honeder C; Magele A; Plontke S; Götze G; Schmutzhard J; Zelger P; Corkill S; Lenarz T; Salcher R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Apr; 280(4):1565-1579. PubMed ID: 36625869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Bonebridge BCI 602 active bone conductive implant in adults: efficacy and stability of audiological, surgical, and functional outcomes.
Cywka KB; Skarzynski PH; Krol B; Hatzopoulos S; Skarzynski H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 279(7):3525-3534. PubMed ID: 35182185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.
Schmerber S; Deguine O; Marx M; Van de Heyning P; Sterkers O; Mosnier I; Garin P; Godey B; Vincent C; Venail F; Mondain M; Deveze A; Lavieille JP; Karkas A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 274(4):1835-1851. PubMed ID: 27475796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone conductive implants in single-sided deafness.
Monini S; Musy I; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 135(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 25720582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of postoperative speech comprehension with the transcutaneous partially implantable bone conduction hearing system Osia®.
Arndt S; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Speck I; Hocke T; Jakob TF; Rauch AK
HNO; 2024 Jan; 72(Suppl 1):1-9. PubMed ID: 37812258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New Active Osseointegrated Implant System in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness.
Willenborg K; Avallone E; Maier H; Lenarz T; Busch S
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 33902037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audiological assessment with Matrix sentence test of percutaneous vs transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a pilot study.
Portelli D; Ciodaro F; Loteta S; Alberti G; Bruno R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Sep; 280(9):4065-4072. PubMed ID: 36933021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative headband assessment for semi-implantable bone conduction hearing devices in conductive hearing loss: is it useful or misleading?
Rainsbury JW; Williams BA; Gulliver M; Morris DP
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 25548890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone conductive implantation in asymmetric hearing loss (AHL).
Monini S; Battilocchi L; Salerno G; Filippi C; Barbara M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 140(8):651-658. PubMed ID: 32329667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes after Application of Active Bone Conducting Implants.
Koro E; Werner M
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 31499490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the Bone-Conduction HeadBand test useful for predicting the functional outcome of a round window active middle ear implant?
Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1329-35. PubMed ID: 23867342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria.
Wimmer W; von Werdt M; Mantokoudis G; Anschuetz L; Kompis M; Caversaccio M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Oct; 46(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 30635142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
