330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26825279)
1. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47():76. PubMed ID: 26419430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 26676611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs.
Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JW; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 27491547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of dominance effects on sow longevity.
Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Puonti M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Dec; 123(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 17177689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linkage disequilibrium patterns and persistence of phase in purebred and crossbred pig (Sus scrofa) populations.
Veroneze R; Bastiaansen JW; Knol EF; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes MS; Lopes PS
BMC Genet; 2014 Nov; 15():126. PubMed ID: 25421851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
