331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26825279)
21. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals.
Vandenplas J; Calus MP; Sevillano CA; Windig JJ; Bastiaansen JW
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):61. PubMed ID: 27549177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JWM; Bergsma R; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):75. PubMed ID: 29061123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.
de Oliveira LF; Brito LF; Marques DBD; da Silva DA; Lopes PS; Dos Santos CG; Johnson JS; Veroneze R
BMC Genom Data; 2023 Dec; 24(1):76. PubMed ID: 38093199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of single-step genomic evaluation for crossbred performance in pig.
Xiang T; Nielsen B; Su G; Legarra A; Christensen OF
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):936-48. PubMed ID: 27065256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Local breed proportions and local breed heterozygosity in genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cows.
Eiríksson JH; Strandén I; Su G; Mäntysaari EA; Christensen OF
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Nov; 105(12):9822-9836. PubMed ID: 36307242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Legarra A
Genetics; 2013 Dec; 195(4):1223-30. PubMed ID: 24121775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
Wei M; van der Werf JH
J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Genome-enabled methods for predicting litter size in pigs: a comparison.
Tusell L; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Forni S; Wu XL; Gianola D
Animal; 2013 Nov; 7(11):1739-49. PubMed ID: 23880322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genomic selection models for directional dominance: an example for litter size in pigs.
Varona L; Legarra A; Herring W; Vitezica ZG
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 29373954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows.
Ehlers MJ; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK; Stalder KJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 16191040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.
Moghaddar N; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):453-462. PubMed ID: 28833716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multivariate gametic model for the analysis of purebred and crossbred data. An example between two populations of Iberian pigs.
Srihi H; López-Carbonell D; Ibáñez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Hernández P; Negro S; Varona L
J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 Mar; 141(2):153-162. PubMed ID: 37888514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
