These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26826074)

  • 21. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases.
    Dokholyan RS; Muhlbaier LH; Falletta JM; Jacobs JP; Shahian D; Haan CK; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2009 Jun; 157(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 19464406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.
    Long T; Fallon D
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17655528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stakeholders' Views of Alternatives to Prospective Informed Consent for Minimal-Risk Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials.
    Whicher D; Kass N; Faden R
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(2):397-409. PubMed ID: 26242962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research.
    Nebeker C; Lagare T; Takemoto M; Lewars B; Crist K; Bloss CS; Kerr J
    Transl Behav Med; 2016 Dec; 6(4):577-586. PubMed ID: 27688250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M;
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight.
    Whicher D; Kass N; Saghai Y; Faden R; Tunis S; Pronovost P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 25742674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Waivers and Alterations to Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Respecting the Principle of Respect for Persons.
    Kim SY; Miller FG
    IRB; 2016; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26964403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Informed consent for pragmatic trials--the integrated consent model.
    Kim SY; Miller FG
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Feb; 370(8):769-72. PubMed ID: 24552326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
    Angell E; Biggs H; Gahleitner F; Dixon-Woods M
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 Nov; 95(11):915-7. PubMed ID: 20573742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical research 2: Legal and ethical issues in research.
    Endacott R
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2007 Jul; 15(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 17289389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The concept of risk in comparative-effectiveness research.
    Lantos JD; Spertus JA
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(22):2129-30. PubMed ID: 25390458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Participants' written informed consent in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials with medicines.
    Dal-Ré R
    Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Mar; 13(3):205-210. PubMed ID: 32073940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations.
    Moreno MA; Goniu N; Moreno PS; Diekema D
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Sep; 16(9):708-13. PubMed ID: 23679571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research ethics for clinical researchers.
    Harnett JD; Neuman R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():19-30. PubMed ID: 25694302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Personal Care in Learning Health Care Systems.
    Miller FG; Kim SY
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2015 Dec; 25(4):419-35. PubMed ID: 26775880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Navigating the legal and ethical foundations of informed consent and confidentiality in integrated primary care.
    Hudgins C; Rose S; Fifield PY; Arnault S
    Fam Syst Health; 2013 Mar; 31(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 23566123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adjudicating entitlements: the emerging discourses of research ethics boards.
    Whittaker E
    Health (London); 2005 Oct; 9(4):513-35. PubMed ID: 16144791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.