163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26826089)
1. Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and CECT in gastric cancer diagnosis.
Staniuk T; Małkowski B; Śrutek E; Szlęzak P; Zegarski W
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jul; 41(7):1349-56. PubMed ID: 26826089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Kim EY; Lee WJ; Choi D; Lee SJ; Choi JY; Kim BT; Kim HS
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 20226612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of combined PET/CT to assess regional lymph node involvement in gastric cancer.
Park K; Jang G; Baek S; Song H
Tumori; 2014; 100(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 24852866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FLT-PET/CT diagnosis of primary and metastatic nodal lesions of gastric cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Yoshiura T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Oct; 41(10):1891-8. PubMed ID: 27255652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Lehmann K; Eshmuminov D; Bauerfeind P; Gubler C; Veit-Haibach P; Weber A; Abdul-Rahman H; Fischer M; Reiner C; Schneider PM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 27692533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of regional lymph node in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
Han D; Yu J; Zhong X; Fu Z; Mu D; Zhang B; Xu G; Yang W; Zhao S
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):416-26. PubMed ID: 21951837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The peak-standardized uptake value (P-SUV) by preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a useful indicator of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.
Oh HH; Lee SE; Choi IS; Choi WJ; Yoon DS; Min HS; Ra YM; Moon JI; Kang YH
J Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 104(5):530-3. PubMed ID: 21618250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FLT PET/CT imaging is not competent for the pretreatment evaluation of metastatic gastric cancer: a comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.
Zhou M; Wang C; Hu S; Zhang Y; Yao Z; Li J; Guo W; Zhang Y
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Jul; 34(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 23604223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-modality PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging for pancreatic cancer.
Zhang J; Zuo CJ; Jia NY; Wang JH; Hu SP; Yu ZF; Zheng Y; Zhang AY; Feng XY
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 21(10):2988-96. PubMed ID: 25780297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography.
Altini C; Niccoli Asabella A; Di Palo A; Fanelli M; Ferrari C; Moschetta M; Rubini G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 May; 94(20):e864. PubMed ID: 25997066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Kunawudhi A; Sereeborwornthanasak K; Promteangtrong C; Siripongpreeda B; Vanprom S; Chotipanich C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(8):4071-5. PubMed ID: 27644663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrated FDG-PET/CT compared with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with resectable early stage esophageal cancer.
Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Kuwabara M; Shimono T; Hosono M; Shiozaki H
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 23(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19205841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer with
Honma Y; Terauchi T; Tateishi U; Kano D; Nagashima K; Shoji H; Iwasa S; Takashima A; Kato K; Hamaguchi T; Boku N; Shimada Y; Yamada Y
Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180259. PubMed ID: 29916721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study of the diagnostic and prognostic values of FLT-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Nihara T; Fukukura Y; Yoshiura T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1210-1221. PubMed ID: 27891549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?
Perlaza P; Ortín J; Pagès M; Buxó E; Fernández-Esparrach G; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Mayoral M; Sánchez N; Ruiz C; Ginés A; Fuster D
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 43(6):402-410. PubMed ID: 29485442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT.
Yun M; Lim JS; Noh SH; Hyung WJ; Cheong JH; Bong JK; Cho A; Lee JD
J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1582-8. PubMed ID: 16204706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Santhosh S; Mittal BR; Bhasin DK; Rana SS; Gupta R; Das A; Nada R
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Oct; 31(8):575-581. PubMed ID: 28689356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
