594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26826418)
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the importance of morphologic and molecular interactions.
Mardekian SK; Bombonati A; Palazzo JP
Hum Pathol; 2016 Mar; 49():114-23. PubMed ID: 26826418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of stromal signatures in the tumor microenvironment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Sharma M; Beck AH; Webster JA; Espinosa I; Montgomery K; Varma S; van de Rijn M; Jensen KC; West RB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Sep; 123(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 19949854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast carcinoma in sclerosing adenosis: a clinicopathological and immunophenotypical analysis on 206 lesions.
Yu BH; Tang SX; Xu XL; Cheng YF; Bi R; Shui RH; Tu XY; Lu HF; Zhou XY; Yang WT
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):546-553. PubMed ID: 29436376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence that molecular changes in cells occur before morphological alterations during the progression of breast ductal carcinoma.
Castro NP; Osório CA; Torres C; Bastos EP; Mourão-Neto M; Soares FA; Brentani HP; Carraro DM
Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(5):R87. PubMed ID: 18928525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphologic, molecular and microenvironment factors associated with stromal invasion in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Role of myoepithelial cells.
Aguiar FN; Cirqueira CS; Bacchi CE; Carvalho FM
Breast Dis; 2015; 35(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 26397772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ductal carcinoma in situ: morphology-based knowledge and molecular advances.
Ross DS; Wen YH; Brogi E
Adv Anat Pathol; 2013 Jul; 20(4):205-16. PubMed ID: 23752083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can tumor-associated macrophages in ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy predict invasive carcinoma on excision?
Hoskoppal D; Reisenbichler ES
Hum Pathol; 2018 Dec; 82():158-162. PubMed ID: 30067949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene expression profiling of tumour epithelial and stromal compartments during breast cancer progression.
Vargas AC; McCart Reed AE; Waddell N; Lane A; Reid LE; Smart CE; Cocciardi S; da Silva L; Song S; Chenevix-Trench G; Simpson PT; Lakhani SR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 135(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 22718308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loss of FAT1 during the progression from DCIS to IDC and predict poor clinical outcome in breast cancer.
Wang L; Lyu S; Wang S; Shen H; Niu F; Liu X; Liu J; Niu Y
Exp Mol Pathol; 2016 Feb; 100(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 26721716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expression profiling of in vivo ductal carcinoma in situ progression models identified B cell lymphoma-9 as a molecular driver of breast cancer invasion.
Elsarraj HS; Hong Y; Valdez KE; Michaels W; Hook M; Smith WP; Chien J; Herschkowitz JI; Troester MA; Beck M; Inciardi M; Gatewood J; May L; Cusick T; McGinness M; Ricci L; Fan F; Tawfik O; Marks JR; Knapp JR; Yeh HW; Thomas P; Carrasco DR; Fields TA; Godwin AK; Behbod F
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Sep; 17():128. PubMed ID: 26384318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer is associated with gene expression programs of EMT and myoepithelia.
Knudsen ES; Ertel A; Davicioni E; Kline J; Schwartz GF; Witkiewicz AK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):1009-24. PubMed ID: 22134623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of HER2 amplification status among breast cancer subgroups offers new insights in pathways of breast cancer progression.
Lambein K; Van Bockstal M; Vandemaele L; Van den Broecke R; Cocquyt V; Geenen S; Denys H; Libbrecht L
Virchows Arch; 2017 Nov; 471(5):575-587. PubMed ID: 28567637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spindle cell ductal carcinoma in situ. An unusual variant of ductal intra-epithelial neoplasia that simulates ductal hyperplasia or a myoepithelial proliferation.
Farshid G; Moinfar F; Meredith DJ; Peiterse S; Tavassoli FA
Virchows Arch; 2001 Jul; 439(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 11499843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The current clinical value of the DCIS Score.
Wood WC; Alvarado M; Buchholz DJ; Hyams D; Hwang S; Manders J; Park C; Solin LJ; White J; Willey S
Oncology (Williston Park); 2014 May; 28 Suppl 2():C2, 1-8, C3. PubMed ID: 25375000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives.
Sakorafas GH; Tsiotou AG
Cancer Treat Rev; 2000 Apr; 26(2):103-25. PubMed ID: 10772968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current treatment trends and the need for better predictive tools in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Martínez-Pérez C; Turnbull AK; Ekatah GE; Arthur LM; Sims AH; Thomas JS; Dixon JM
Cancer Treat Rev; 2017 Apr; 55():163-172. PubMed ID: 28402908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accompanying DCIS in breast cancer patients with invasive ductal carcinoma is predictive of improved local recurrence-free survival.
Dieterich M; Hartwig F; Stubert J; Klöcking S; Kundt G; Stengel B; Reimer T; Gerber B
Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 24559611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of copy number alterations associated with the progression of DCIS to invasive ductal carcinoma.
Johnson CE; Gorringe KL; Thompson ER; Opeskin K; Boyle SE; Wang Y; Hill P; Mann GB; Campbell IG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):889-98. PubMed ID: 22052326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological type and marker expression of the primary tumour compared with its local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bijker N; Peterse JL; Duchateau L; Robanus-Maandag EC; Bosch CA; Duval C; Pilotti S; van de Vijver MJ
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 11207051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
