These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26826716)

  • 1. FastLSU: a more practical approach for the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR controlling procedure for huge-scale testing problems.
    Madar V; Batista S
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(11):1716-23. PubMed ID: 26826716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple testing in genome-wide association studies via hidden Markov models.
    Wei Z; Sun W; Wang K; Hakonarson H
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 25(21):2802-8. PubMed ID: 19654115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.
    Green GH; Diggle PJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative approach to multiple testing for methylation QTL mapping reduces the proportion of falsely identified CpGs.
    Luijk R; Goeman JJ; Slagboom EP; Heijmans BT; van Zwet EW
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 25282645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An adaptive single-step FDR procedure with applications to DNA microarray analysis.
    Iyer V; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17342954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies.
    Sun L; Craiu RV; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):519-30. PubMed ID: 16800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RedNemo: topology-based PPI network reconstruction via repeated diffusion with neighborhood modifications.
    Alkan F; Erten C
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 27797764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast-SNP: a fast matrix pre-processing algorithm for efficient loopless flux optimization of metabolic models.
    Saa PA; Nielsen LK
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 32(24):3807-3814. PubMed ID: 27559155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global FDR control across multiple RNAseq experiments.
    Liou L; Hornburg M; Robertson DS
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36326442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic peak selection by a Benjamini-Hochberg-based algorithm.
    Abbas A; Kong XB; Liu Z; Jing BY; Gao X
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53112. PubMed ID: 23308147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for partial conjunction hypotheses.
    Benjamini Y; Heller R
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18261164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified FDR controlling procedure for multi-stage analyses.
    Tuglus C; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article 12. PubMed ID: 19222379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.