These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26827051)

  • 1. Reading ability influences native and non-native voice recognition, even for unimpaired readers.
    Kadam MA; Orena AJ; Theodore RM; Polka L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):EL6-12. PubMed ID: 26827051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Language exposure facilitates talker learning prior to language comprehension, even in adults.
    Orena AJ; Theodore RM; Polka L
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():36-40. PubMed ID: 26113447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex.
    Perrachione TK; Wong PC
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1899-910. PubMed ID: 17258240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2409. PubMed ID: 29716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker Processing in Mandarin-Speaking Congenital Amusics.
    Shao J; Wang L; Zhang C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32343927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect.
    Johnson EK; Bruggeman L; Cutler A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):633-645. PubMed ID: 28744902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human voice recognition depends on language ability.
    Perrachione TK; Del Tufo SN; Gabrieli JD
    Science; 2011 Jul; 333(6042):595. PubMed ID: 21798942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When less is heard than meets the ear: change deafness in a telephone conversation.
    Fenn KM; Shintel H; Atkins AS; Skipper JI; Bond VC; Nusbaum HC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1442-56. PubMed ID: 21604232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.
    Theodore RM; Myers EB; Lomibao JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1068-78. PubMed ID: 26328722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese.
    Goswami U; Wang HL; Cruz A; Fosker T; Mead N; Huss M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):325-37. PubMed ID: 20146613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language.
    Kisilevsky BS; Hains SM; Brown CA; Lee CT; Cowperthwaite B; Stutzman SS; Swansburg ML; Lee K; Xie X; Huang H; Ye HH; Zhang K; Wang Z
    Infant Behav Dev; 2009 Jan; 32(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 19058856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ability for voice recognition is a marker for dyslexia in children.
    Perea M; Jiménez M; Suárez-Coalla P; Fernández N; Viña C; Cuetos F
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(6):480-7. PubMed ID: 24962123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.