These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26827272)

  • 1. [Computerized ranking test in three French universities: Staff experience and students' feedback].
    Roux D; Meyer G; Cymbalista F; Bouaziz JD; Falgarone G; Tesniere A; Gervais J; Cariou A; Peffault de Latour R; Marat M; Moenaert E; Guebli T; Rodriguez O; Lefort A; Dreyfuss D; Hajage D; Ricard JD
    Rev Med Interne; 2016 Mar; 37(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 26827272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Impact of training conferences on medical student's performance for the French National Ranking Examination in Lorraine University. The ETIMCEL experimental study].
    Agrinier N; Bannay A; Santini J; Braun M; Angioi K; Debouverie M; Zuily S;
    Rev Med Interne; 2015 Feb; 36(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 25109445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Association between students' clinical performance and their success in the computerized national ranking tests: A single-center retrospective cohort study].
    Azoyan L; Lombardi Y; Renaud MC; Duguet A; Georgin-Lavialle S; Cohen-Aubart F; Ibanez G; Steichen O
    Rev Med Interne; 2023 Jan; 44(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 35934597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of the discrimination of the final marks after the first computerized national ranking exam in Medicine in June 2016 in France].
    Rivière E; Quinton A; Dehail P
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 May; 40(5):286-290. PubMed ID: 30902508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Triple jump examination evaluation of faculty examiners by dental student examinees.
    Navazesh M; Rich SK; Keim RG
    J Dent Educ; 2014 May; 78(5):714-22. PubMed ID: 24789831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does socioeconomic status have any influence on success at the national ranking exam?, a prospective survey.
    Bouchghoul H; Teboul JL; Senat MV; Vigoureux S
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):402. PubMed ID: 33138812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [First steps towards a comparative evaluation of the French medical schools].
    Rabineau D; Dhainaut JF
    Presse Med; 2010 Jan; 39(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 20045281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do teaching faculty resources affect the choice of medical career?
    Roussel F; Gehanno JF; Ladner J; Benichou J
    Med Teach; 2006 Dec; 28(8):734-41. PubMed ID: 17594587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing medical students' performance in core competencies using multiple admission programs for colleges and universities: from the perspective of multi-source feedback.
    Fang JT; Ko YS; Chien CC; Yu KH
    Biomed J; 2013; 36(4):188-97. PubMed ID: 23989314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of assessment grading and nursing students' perceptions of quality in sessional and tenured teachers.
    Salamonson Y; Halcomb EJ; Andrew S; Peters K; Jackson D
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Dec; 42(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 21091625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of student research projects in dental education.
    Guven Y; Uysal O
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 May; 15(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 21492344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature on 2009 National Ranking in France].
    Lorette G; Jolly D; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL
    Presse Med; 2010 Jun; 39(6):e118-25. PubMed ID: 20462733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
    Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unravelling the complexities of nursing students' feedback on the clinical learning environment: a mixed methods approach.
    Salamonson Y; Everett B; Halcomb E; Hutchinson M; Jackson D; Mannix J; Peters K; Weaver R
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jan; 35(1):206-11. PubMed ID: 25200510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of usefulness of smart device-based testing: a survey study of Korean medical students.
    Lee YC; Kwon OY; Hwang HJ; Ko SH
    Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Sep; 32(3):213-221. PubMed ID: 32894922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation study of student satisfaction in the faculty of medicine Denis-Diderot-Paris-VII for their teaching in obstetric gynaecology].
    Desroque D; Akerman G; Maillard D; Fazel A; Mandelbrot L; Barranger E
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Dec; 38(12):735-9. PubMed ID: 21111649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of feedback from standardized patients on medical students' performance and perceptions of the neurological examination.
    Park JH; Son JY; Kim S; May W
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(12):1005-10. PubMed ID: 22225438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students' perceptions about feedback.
    Murdoch-Eaton D; Sargeant J
    Med Educ; 2012 Jul; 46(7):711-21. PubMed ID: 22691150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
    Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.