BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26827979)

  • 1. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.
    Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
    Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.
    Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?
    Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Correlation between hard tissue and soft tissue landmarks.
    Economou S; Stoustrup P; Kristensen KD; Dalstra M; Küseler A; Herlin T; Pedersen TK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):662-672.e1. PubMed ID: 29706214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial soft-tissue thickness in patients affected by bilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Ersoz M; Celik S; Sisman Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 25439207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry: an analysis using computed tomography.
    Yáñez-Vico RM; Iglesias-Linares A; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL; Solano-Reina E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20632049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the Facial Soft Tissue Thickness of the Patients Affected by Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1647-51. PubMed ID: 26114525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21459833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Assessment Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.
    Al-Housami SA; Shawky M; El-Morsy K; Abdel-Ghany H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):e702-6. PubMed ID: 26594979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images.
    Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):856-64. PubMed ID: 21469969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of pharyngeal airway changes on plain radiography and cone-beam computed tomography after orthognathic surgery.
    Sears CR; Miller AJ; Chang MK; Huang JC; Lee JS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e385-94. PubMed ID: 21778015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.