315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26827986)
1. Dimensional accuracy of digital dental models from cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions according to time elapsed after the impressions.
Lee SM; Hou Y; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 26827986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of digital dental models obtained from dental cone-beam computed tomography scan of alginate impressions.
Jiang T; Lee SM; Hou Y; Chang X; Hwang HS
Korean J Orthod; 2016 May; 46(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 27226958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
Cesur MG; Omurlu IK; Ozer T
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 29072243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digitization of dental alginate impression: Three-dimensional evaluation of point cloud.
Kim SR; Lee WS; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):835-40. PubMed ID: 26632232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [EVALUATION OF CHANGES OF GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS OF ALGINATE DENTAL IMPRESSIONS DUE TO THE INFLUENCE OF CHEMICAL AND MICROWAVE DISINFECTION METHOD USING 3D TECHNOLOGIES].
Nespraydko VP; Shevchuk VA; Michaylov AA; Lyseyko NV
Lik Sprava; 2015; (7-8):117-23. PubMed ID: 27491163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials.
Demajo JK; Cassar V; Farrugia C; Millan-Sango D; Sammut C; Valdramidis V; Camilleri J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 26757331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials.
Imbery TA; Nehring J; Janus C; Moon PC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 20045819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging.
Kim SY; Kim MJ; Han JS; Yeo IS; Lim YJ; Kwon HB
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 23476911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
Boden J; Likeman P; Clark R
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index.
Kau CH; Littlefield J; Rainy N; Nguyen JT; Creed B
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 20050733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dimensional accuracy of jaw scans performed on alginate impressions or stone models: A practice-oriented study.
Vogel AB; Kilic F; Schmidt F; Rübel S; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jul; 76(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 26123733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
Alcan T; Ceylanoğlu C; Baysal B
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 19123710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimensional stability of alginate molds scanned at different storage times.
Daneu GD; Vasconcelos JB; Oltramari PV; de Almeida MR; Guiraldo RD; Fernandes TM
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2020 Dec; 33(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 33523088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
