These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26828149)

  • 1. Initial Staging of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Regional Lymph Nodes: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted MRI With 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
    Cerny M; Dunet V; Prior JO; Hahnloser D; Wagner AD; Meuli RA; Schmidt S
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 41(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 26828149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
    Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI.
    Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Nensa F; Grueneisen J; Gomez B; Köhler J; Reis H; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L; Heusch P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116277. PubMed ID: 25574968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to radiochemotherapy: DW-MRI and multiparametric PET/CT in correlation with histopathology.
    Cerny M; Dunet V; Rebecchini C; Hahnloser D; Prior J; Sempoux C; Schmidt S
    Nuklearmedizin; 2019 Feb; 58(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 30769371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
    Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
    Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
    Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PET/MRI Characterization of Mucinous Versus Nonmucinous Components of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of Tumor Metabolism and Cellularity.
    Queiroz MA; Naves A; Dreyer PR; Cerri GG; Buchpiguel CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):376-383. PubMed ID: 33295813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): a pilot study on the assessment of treatment response in comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Schmidt S; Dunet V; Koehli M; Montemurro M; Meuli R; Prior JO
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):837-42. PubMed ID: 23761549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlations between DW-MRI and
    Connor S; Sit C; Anjari M; Szyszko T; Dunn J; Pai I; Cook G; Goh V
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1360. PubMed ID: 33960739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parameters of simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI predict tumor stage and several histopathological features in uterine cervical cancer.
    Surov A; Meyer HJ; Schob S; Höhn AK; Bremicker K; Exner M; Stumpp P; Purz S
    Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(17):28285-28296. PubMed ID: 28423698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective Correlation of Prognostic Immunohistochemical Markers With SUV and ADC Derived From Dedicated Hybrid Breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Morawitz J; Kirchner J; Martin O; Bruckmann NM; Dietzel F; Li Y; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Bittner AK; Mohrmann S; Ingenwerth M; Häberle L; Esposito I; Antoch G; Buchbender C; Sawicki LM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 46(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 33351505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Additional Role of F18-FDG PET/CT in Characterizing MRI-Diagnosed Tumor Deposits in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
    Roef MJ; van den Berg K; Rutten HJT; Burger J; Nederend J
    Tomography; 2024 Apr; 10(4):632-642. PubMed ID: 38668405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of
    Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Yoo IR; Jung JY; Im SA; Chung YG; Kang JH
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20181051. PubMed ID: 31322913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging of lymphoma nodal target lesions: Comparison of PET standardized uptake value (SUV) with MR apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
    Bernstine H; Domachevsky L; Nidam M; Goldberg N; Abadi-Korek I; Shpilberg O; Groshar D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0490. PubMed ID: 29668631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between glycolytic activity on [18F]-FDG-PET and cell density on diffusion-weighted MRI in lymphoma at staging.
    Giraudo C; Karanikas G; Weber M; Raderer M; Jaeger U; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1217-1226. PubMed ID: 29086453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
    Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
    Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.