These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26829794)
21. Experience of Robotic Exoskeleton Use at Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers. Heinemann AW; Jayaraman A; Mummidisetty CK; Spraggins J; Pinto D; Charlifue S; Tefertiller C; Taylor HB; Chang SH; Stampas A; Furbish CL; Field-Fote EC J Neurol Phys Ther; 2018 Oct; 42(4):256-267. PubMed ID: 30199518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical considerations in the design of lower limb exoskeletons. Cenciarini M; Dollar AM IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975366. PubMed ID: 22275570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical feasibility of gait training with a robotic exoskeleton (WPAL) in an individual with both incomplete cervical and complete thoracic spinal cord injury: A case study. Tanabe S; Koyama S; Saitoh E; Hirano S; Yatsuya K; Tsunoda T; Katoh M; Gotoh T; Furumoto A NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 28527225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. User satisfaction with lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons. Poritz JMP; Taylor HB; Francisco G; Chang SH Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):322-327. PubMed ID: 30786789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Flexible lower limb exoskeleton systems: A review. Meng Q; Zeng Q; Xie Q; Fei C; Kong B; Lu X; Wang H; Yu H NeuroRehabilitation; 2022; 50(4):367-390. PubMed ID: 35147568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New generation emerging technologies for neurorehabilitation and motor assistance. Frisoli A; Solazzi M; Loconsole C; Barsotti M Acta Myol; 2016 Dec; 35(3):141-144. PubMed ID: 28484314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. State of the art and challenges for the classification of studies on electromechanical and robotic devices in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review. Gandolfi M; Valè N; Posteraro F; Morone G; Dell'orco A; Botticelli A; Dimitrova E; Gervasoni E; Goffredo M; Zenzeri J; Antonini A; Daniele C; Benanti P; Boldrini P; Bonaiuti D; Castelli E; Draicchio F; Falabella V; Galeri S; Gimigliano F; Grigioni M; Mazzon S; Molteni F; Petrarca M; Picelli A; Senatore M; Turchetti G; Giansanti D; Mazzoleni S; Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Oct; 57(5):831-840. PubMed ID: 34042413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness. de Miguel-Fernández J; Lobo-Prat J; Prinsen E; Font-Llagunes JM; Marchal-Crespo L J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 36805777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EXiO-A Brain-Controlled Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Rhesus Macaques. Vouga T; Zhuang KZ; Olivier J; Lebedev MA; Nicolelis MA; Bouri M; Bleuler H IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Feb; 25(2):131-141. PubMed ID: 28141525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Functional Assessment of a Myoelectric Postural Controller and Multi-Functional Prosthetic Hand by Persons With Trans-Radial Limb Loss. Segil JL; Huddle SA; Weir RFF IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jun; 25(6):618-627. PubMed ID: 27390181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An assistive lower limb exoskeleton for people with neurological gait disorders. Ortlieb A; Bouri M; Baud R; Bleuler H IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():441-446. PubMed ID: 28813859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advances in Automation Technologies for Lower Extremity Neurorehabilitation: A Review and Future Challenges. Deng W; Papavasileiou I; Qiao Z; Zhang W; Lam KY; Han S IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2018; 11():289-305. PubMed ID: 29994006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lower-Limb Medical and Rehabilitation Exoskeletons: A Review of the Current Designs. Plaza A; Hernandez M; Puyuelo G; Garces E; Garcia E IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2023; 16():278-291. PubMed ID: 33961563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A hybrid BMI-based exoskeleton for paresis: EMG control for assisting arm movements. Kawase T; Sakurada T; Koike Y; Kansaku K J Neural Eng; 2017 Feb; 14(1):016015. PubMed ID: 28068293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Lajeunesse V; Vincent C; Routhier F; Careau E; Michaud F Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Oct; 11(7):535-47. PubMed ID: 26340538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Noncontact Capacitive Sensing-Based Locomotion Transition Recognition for Amputees With Robotic Transtibial Prostheses. Zheng E; Wang Q IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Feb; 25(2):161-170. PubMed ID: 26890910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: a narrative review. Chu CY; Patterson RM J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9. PubMed ID: 29454392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improved Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Trajectory Tracking Control of Lower Limb Robotic Rehabilitation Exoskeleton. Aole S; Elamvazuthi I; Waghmare L; Patre B; Meriaudeau F Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 32630115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]