247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26830606)
1. CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.
Theis J; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Muñoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 26830606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective and Subjective Intrapatient Comparison of Iohexol Versus Diatrizoate for Bowel Preparation Quality at CT Colonography.
Johnson B; Hinshaw JL; Robbins JB; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1202-7. PubMed ID: 27010251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-volume hybrid bowel preparation combining saline laxatives with oral contrast agents versus standard polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy.
Lawrence EM; Pickhardt PJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Aug; 53(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20628282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-individual comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for bowel preparation at CT colonography: automated volumetric analysis of residual fluid for quality assessment.
Bannas P; Bakke J; Munoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
Clin Radiol; 2014 Nov; 69(11):1171-7. PubMed ID: 25239789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of same-day CT colonography following incomplete optical colonoscopy.
O'Shea A; Foran AT; Murray TE; Thornton E; Dunne R; Lee MJ; Morrin MM
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6508-6516. PubMed ID: 32613286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.
Pollentine A; Mortimer A; McCoubrie P; Archer L
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):1085-92. PubMed ID: 22422379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.
Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.
Borden ZS; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Agriantonis DJ; Hinshaw JL
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 20032148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal timing for faecal tagging in same day CT colonography for patients with failed colonoscopy.
Saluja S; Gaikstas G; Sapundzieski M
Radiography (Lond); 2017 May; 23(2):e47-e49. PubMed ID: 28390559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal-tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study.
Yoon SH; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim SJ; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 19820488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy.
Meric K; Bakal N; Aydin S; Yesil A; Tekesin K; Simsek M
Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 25895857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality.
Kim B; Park SH; Hong GS; Lee JH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1561-9. PubMed ID: 25576229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.
Jensch S; Bipat S; Peringa J; de Vries AH; Heutinck A; Dekker E; Baak LC; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 19626326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas.
Benson M; Dureja P; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau PR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2578-85. PubMed ID: 20842111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of computed tomography colonography (CTC) after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
Maggialetti N; Capasso R; Pinto D; Carbone M; Laporta A; Schipani S; Piccolo CL; Zappia M; Reginelli A; D'Innocenzo M; Brunese L
Int J Surg; 2016 Sep; 33 Suppl 1():S36-44. PubMed ID: 27255132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery.
Neri E; Turini F; Cerri F; Faggioni L; Vagli P; Naldini G; Bartolozzi C
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 19763682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.
Taylor SA; Slater A; Burling DN; Tam E; Greenhalgh R; Gartner L; Scarth J; Pearce R; Bassett P; Halligan S
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17404739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography.
Buchach CM; Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Oct; 36(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 21184064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated volumetric analysis for comparison of oral sulfate solution (SUPREP) with established cathartic agents at CT colonography.
Bannas P; Bakke J; Patrick JL; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24965898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
