706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26830693)
1. Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans.
Xavier A; Muir WM; Rainey KM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():55. PubMed ID: 26830693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population.
Jarquín D; Kocak K; Posadas L; Hyma K; Jedlicka J; Graef G; Lorenz A
BMC Genomics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):740. PubMed ID: 25174348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.
Ali M; Zhang Y; Rasheed A; Wang J; Zhang L
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 32079240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.
Bimber BN; Raboin MJ; Letaw J; Nevonen KA; Spindel JE; McCouch SR; Cervera-Juanes R; Spindel E; Carbone L; Ferguson B; Vinson A
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):676. PubMed ID: 27558348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing Predictive Properties of Genome-Wide Selection in Soybeans.
Xavier A; Muir WM; Rainey KM
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2611-6. PubMed ID: 27317786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ascertainment bias from imputation methods evaluation in wheat.
Brandariz SP; González Reymúndez A; Lado B; Malosetti M; Garcia AA; Quincke M; von Zitzewitz J; Castro M; Matus I; Del Pozo A; Castro AJ; Gutiérrez L
BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):773. PubMed ID: 27716058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic consequences of selection and genome-wide association mapping in soybean.
Wen Z; Boyse JF; Song Q; Cregan PB; Wang D
BMC Genomics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):671. PubMed ID: 26334313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic Prediction and Association Mapping of Curd-Related Traits in Gene Bank Accessions of Cauliflower.
Thorwarth P; Yousef EAA; Schmid KJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Feb; 8(2):707-718. PubMed ID: 29255118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genotype imputation for soybean nested association mapping population to improve precision of QTL detection.
Chen L; Yang S; Araya S; Quigley C; Taliercio E; Mian R; Specht JE; Diers BW; Song Q
Theor Appl Genet; 2022 May; 135(5):1797-1810. PubMed ID: 35275252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of loci governing eight agronomic traits using a GBS-GWAS approach and validation by QTL mapping in soya bean.
Sonah H; O'Donoughue L; Cober E; Rajcan I; Belzile F
Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Feb; 13(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 25213593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
