111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26831271)
1. Non-linear polynomial filters for edge enhancement of mammogram lesions.
Bhateja V; Misra M; Urooj S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Jun; 129():125-34. PubMed ID: 26831271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient Denoising Framework for Mammogram Images with a New Impulse Detector and Non-Local Means.
Rajaguru H; S R SC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jan; 21(1):179-183. PubMed ID: 31983182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonlinear unsharp masking for mammogram enhancement.
Panetta K; Zhou Y; Agaian S; Jia H
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Nov; 15(6):918-28. PubMed ID: 21843996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantum and impulse noise filtering from breast mammogram images.
Naveed N; Hussain A; Arfan Jaffar M; Choi TS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Dec; 108(3):1062-9. PubMed ID: 22940136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms.
Peng W; Mayorga RV; Hussein EM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Mar; 125():134-44. PubMed ID: 26742491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis--local affine transformation for improved localization.
Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1070-9. PubMed ID: 11439476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ipsilateral-mammogram computer-aided detection of breast cancer.
Sun X; Qian W; Song D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Apr; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 15081498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Image Enhancement Module for Analysis of Mammogram Images for Diagnostics of Breast Cancer.
Almalki YE; Soomro TA; Irfan M; Alduraibi SK; Ali A
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 35271015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new idea for visualization of lesions distribution in mammogram based on CPD registration method.
Pan X; Qi B; Yu H; Wei H; Kang Y
Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):459-467. PubMed ID: 28582934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 25059254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A wavelet-based mammographic image denoising and enhancement with homomorphic filtering.
Gorgel P; Sertbas A; Ucan ON
J Med Syst; 2010 Dec; 34(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 20703608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer detection using combined curvelet based enhancement and a novel segmentation methods.
Senthilkumar B; Umamaheswari G
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2015 Mar; 159(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 24457833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tree-structured nonlinear filters in digital mammography.
Qian W; Clarke LP; Kallergi M; Clark RA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 18218481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer aided decision system for early detection of breast cancer.
Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
Indian J Med Res; 2006 Aug; 124(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 17015928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade.
Jansen SA; Newstead GM; Abe H; Shimauchi A; Schmidt RA; Karczmar GS
Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 18024450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
