These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26831271)

  • 21. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening.
    Mello-Thoms C; Chapman B
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):894-908. PubMed ID: 15288040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Segmentation and detection of breast cancer in mammograms combining wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm.
    Pereira DC; Ramos RP; do Nascimento MZ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Apr; 114(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 24513228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal mammogram image registration using optimized curvilinear coordinates.
    Abdel-Nasser M; Moreno A; Puig D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():1-14. PubMed ID: 27000285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Breast ultrasound image enhancement using fuzzy logic.
    Guo Y; Cheng HD; Huang J; Tian J; Zhao W; Sun L; Su Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 16464669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wavelet domain non-linear filtering for MRI denoising.
    Anand CS; Sahambi JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 28(6):842-61. PubMed ID: 20418039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
    Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.
    Duarte MA; Alvarenga AV; Azevedo CM; Calas MJ; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 26363676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography at 3.0T with X-ray mammograms: pilot study evaluation using dedicated semi-automatic registration software.
    Dietzel M; Hopp T; Ruiter N; Zoubi R; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e98-e102. PubMed ID: 21570793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammogram retrieval on similar mass lesions.
    Wei CH; Chen SY; Liu X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jun; 106(3):234-48. PubMed ID: 20933295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feature and contrast enhancement of mammographic image based on multiscale analysis and morphology.
    Wu S; Yu S; Yang Y; Xie Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():716948. PubMed ID: 24416072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital Mammograms with Image Enhancement Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review.
    Suradi SH; Abdullah KA
    Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(9):1078-1084. PubMed ID: 33504312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography.
    Moradmand H; Setayeshi S; Karimian AR; Sirous M; Akbari ME
    Iran J Cancer Prev; 2012; 5(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25628822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Extraction of quantitative blur measures for circumscribed lesions in mammograms.
    Richter JH; Claridge E
    Med Inform (Lond); 1991; 16(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 1921565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.