These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26831271)

  • 41. Spectral phase based medical image processing.
    Kothapalli SR; Yelleswarapu CS; Naraharisetty SG; Wu P; Rao DV
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):708-21. PubMed ID: 15935969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automatic intensity windowing of mammographic images based on a perceptual metric.
    Albiol A; Corbi A; Albiol F
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1369-1378. PubMed ID: 28160525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography.
    Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Sakellaropoulos P; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):410-20. PubMed ID: 10844867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An automatic mass detection system in mammograms based on complex texture features.
    Tai SC; Chen ZS; Tsai WT
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Mar; 18(2):618-27. PubMed ID: 24608061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
    Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Optimization of wavelet decomposition for image compression and feature preservation.
    Lo SC; Li H; Freedman MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1141-51. PubMed ID: 12956269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Independent evaluation of computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms.
    Rana RS; Jiang Y; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Liu B
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 17307670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
    Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Human visual system-based image enhancement and logarithmic contrast measure.
    Panetta KA; Wharton EJ; Agaian SS
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Feb; 38(1):174-88. PubMed ID: 18270089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Computerized Analysis of Mammogram Images for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Almalki YE; Soomro TA; Irfan M; Alduraibi SK; Ali A
    Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Apr; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 35627938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Early signs of cancer present in the fine detail of mammograms.
    Raat EM; Evans KK
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282872. PubMed ID: 37018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Robust Edge Detection Approach in the Presence of High Impulse Noise Intensity through Switching Adaptive Median and Fixed Weighted Mean Filtering.
    Mafi M; Rajaei H; Cabrerizo M; Adjouadi M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30028707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Edge Probability and Pixel Relativity-Based Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion.
    Mishra D; Chaudhury S; Sarkar M; Soin AS; Sharma V
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Feb; 27(2):649-664. PubMed ID: 29028196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improvement of lesion detectability by speckle reduction filtering: a quantitative study.
    Verhoeven JT; Thijssen JM
    Ultrason Imaging; 1993 Jul; 15(3):181-204. PubMed ID: 8879091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.