These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 268314)

  • 21. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An additive-dominance model to determine chromosomal effects in chromosome substitution lines and other gemplasms.
    Wu J; Jenkins JN; McCarty JC; Saha S; Stelly DM
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 Feb; 112(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 16341682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effects of intervarietal genetic heterogeneity in oats by results of F1 diallele analysis].
    Egorova TV; Skorik VV; Ternovskaia TK
    Tsitol Genet; 2002; 36(4):8-16. PubMed ID: 12379021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid.
    Hua J; Xing Y; Wu W; Xu C; Sun X; Yu S; Zhang Q
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(5):2574-9. PubMed ID: 12604771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting the frequencies of transgressive segregants for yield and yield components in wheat.
    Snape JW
    Theor Appl Genet; 1982 Jun; 62(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 24270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of a triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines reveals a significant role of epistasis in heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis.
    Kusterer B; Muminovic J; Utz HF; Piepho HP; Barth S; Heckenberger M; Meyer RC; Altmann T; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):2009-17. PubMed ID: 17287529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic analysis of crossfostering data with sire and dam records.
    Riska B; Rutledge JJ; Atchley WR
    J Hered; 1985; 76(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 4031461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bi- and multivariate analyses of diallel crosses: a tool for the genetic dissection of neurobehavioral phenotypes.
    Crusio WE
    Behav Genet; 1993 Jan; 23(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8476392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The biometrical genetics of competitive parameters in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hemmat M; Eggleston P
    Heredity (Edinb); 1990 Apr; 64 ( Pt 2)():223-31. PubMed ID: 2111300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic variation in composite and parental populations: expectations for levels of dominance and gene frequency.
    Mohd-Yusuff MK; Dickerson GE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Oct; 69(10):3983-8. PubMed ID: 1778811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance.
    Lo LL; Fernando RL; Grossman M
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2877-84. PubMed ID: 9374299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mapping quantitative trait loci with additive effects and additive x additive epistatic interactions for biomass yield, grain yield, and straw yield using a doubled haploid population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
    Li ZK; Jiang XL; Peng T; Shi CL; Han SX; Tian B; Zhu ZL; Tian JC
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Feb; 13(1):1412-24. PubMed ID: 24634240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Egg laying and egg quality in meat type quails in diallel crosses.
    Drumond EC; Pires AV; Bonafé CM; Pinheiro SR; Veloso RC; Amaral JM; Abreu LR
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Oct; 13(4):8118-25. PubMed ID: 25299196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Widespread epistasis regulates glucose homeostasis and gene expression.
    Chen A; Liu Y; Williams SM; Morris N; Buchner DA
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1007025. PubMed ID: 28961251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cross prediction studies on spring barley : 1. Estimation of genetical and environmental control of morphological and maturity characters.
    Thomas WT; Tapsell CR
    Theor Appl Genet; 1983 Mar; 64(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 24265084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulation of quantitative characters by genes with biochemically definable action. III. The components of genetic effects in the inheritance of anthocyanins in Matthiola incana R. Br.
    Jana S; Seyffert W
    Theor Appl Genet; 1971 Jan; 41(8):329-37. PubMed ID: 24430522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Method to represent the distribution of QTL additive and dominance effects associated with quantitative traits in computer simulation.
    Sun X; Mumm RH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26852240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.