These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26832964)

  • 1. Reprint of 'A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals'.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Feb; 69():254-60. PubMed ID: 26832964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():13-20. PubMed ID: 26484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.
    R P; S SD
    J Med Syst; 2020 Feb; 44(3):66. PubMed ID: 32040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):980-6. PubMed ID: 21497127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the classification rate of labor vs. normal pregnancy contractions by using EHG multichannel recordings.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4642-5. PubMed ID: 21096236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Muszynski C; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23192483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-channel electrohysterography enabled uterine contraction characterization and its effect in delivery assessment.
    Shen J; Liu Y; Zhang M; Pumir A; Mu L; Li B; Xu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Dec; 167():107697. PubMed ID: 37976821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronization in the bivariate intrauterine pressure signals' nonlinear dynamics methods.
    Oczeretko E; Borowska M; Kitlas A; Laudanski P; Laudanski T
    Reprod Sci; 2010 Jul; 17(7):667-72. PubMed ID: 20404355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Significance of the site of uterine contraction for labor progress and duration of pregnancy].
    Spätling L; Danders R; Behrens C; Hasenburg A; Fallenstein F
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994; 198(5-6):204-6. PubMed ID: 7717009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the propagation analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar J; Oei G; Bergmans J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3868-71. PubMed ID: 19163557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative performance analysis of four methods of evaluating signal nonlinearity: application to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1045-8. PubMed ID: 23366074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of filtering on the classification rate of nonlinear analysis methods applied to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Falou O; Hassan M; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4182-5. PubMed ID: 26737216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance analysis of four nonlinearity analysis methods using a model with variable complexity and application to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 24593872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of intrauterine pressure from electrohysterography using optimal linear filtering.
    Skowronski MD; Harris JG; Marossero DE; Edwards RK; Euliano TY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1983-9. PubMed ID: 17019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlinearity of EHG signals used to distinguish active labor from normal pregnancy contractions.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2387-90. PubMed ID: 21096805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.