These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26833200)

  • 1. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phasic alertness and residual switch costs in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 27831719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-switching costs have distinct phase-locked and nonphase-locked EEG power effects.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Sauseng P; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13533. PubMed ID: 31994736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance.
    Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1346-1369. PubMed ID: 30725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partitioning switch costs when investigating task switching in relation to media multitasking.
    Schneider DW; Chun H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):910-917. PubMed ID: 33634358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-switching costs disappear if non-Chinese participants respond to Chinese characters.
    Li X; Li B; Liu X; Lages M; Stoet G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2051-2071. PubMed ID: 30730179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 21299334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disentangling the Roles of Cue Visibility and Knowledge in Adjusting Cognitive Control: A Preregistered Direct Replication of the Farooqui and Manly (2015) Study.
    Bejjani C; Dolgin J; Zhang Z; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Apr; 31(4):468-479. PubMed ID: 32223719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.