BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26833798)

  • 1. Exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect on a binary outcome.
    Li X; Ding P
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 26833798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sharp nonparametric bounds and randomization inference for treatment effects on an ordinal outcome.
    Chiba Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(25):3966-3975. PubMed ID: 28703430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomization inference for treatment effects on a binary outcome.
    Rigdon J; Hudgens MG
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):924-35. PubMed ID: 25471299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On exact randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals.
    Fiksel J
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38837900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals for single-case effect size measures based on randomization test inversion.
    Michiels B; Heyvaert M; Meulders A; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):363-381. PubMed ID: 26927003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-arm noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints.
    Hida E; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):774-89. PubMed ID: 23799810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stratified exact tests for the weak causal null hypothesis in randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):986-997. PubMed ID: 28605047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood-based inference for bounds of causal parameters.
    Lee W; Sjölander A; Larsson A; Pawitan Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4695-4706. PubMed ID: 30155912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing the width of confidence intervals for the difference between two population means by inverting adaptive tests.
    O'Gorman TW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1422-1436. PubMed ID: 27507285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.
    Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.
    Bender R
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Apr; 22(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 11306148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
    Small DS; Cheng J
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unconditional efficient one-sided confidence limits for the odds ratio based on conditional likelihood.
    Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5136-46. PubMed ID: 17437251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the use of randomization tests following adaptive designs.
    Galbete A; Rosenberger WF
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 26043105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.
    Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML; Li J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 25632882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.