These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26834122)

  • 1. Harmonic Frequency Lowering: Effects on the Perception of Music Detail and Sound Quality.
    Kirchberger M; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
    Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Kirchberger M; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26868955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 23172009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.
    Moore BC
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):159-72. PubMed ID: 23172008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.
    Hockley NS; Bahlmann F; Fulton B
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):146-58. PubMed ID: 23258618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing.
    Jürgens T; Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Meddis R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 26918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music and hearing aids--an introduction.
    Chasin M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23258616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a music perception test for adult hearing-aid users.
    Uys M; van Dijk C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2011 Oct; 58():19-47. PubMed ID: 22216557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
    Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Alexander JM; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Musicians and hearing aid design--is your hearing instrument being overworked?
    Schmidt M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 23258617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.
    Sabin AT; Souza PE
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):94-107. PubMed ID: 24028890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
    Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.