These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The peer review process III: when the decision is made. Riss P Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what? Schachat AP Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fate of the peer review process at the ESA: long-term outcome of submitted studies over a 5-year period. Raptis DA; Oberkofler CE; Gouma D; Garden OJ; Bismuth H; Lerut T; Clavien PA Ann Surg; 2010 Nov; 252(5):715-25. PubMed ID: 21037426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts. Opthof T; Furstner F; van Geer M; Coronel R Cardiovasc Res; 2000 Jan; 45(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 10728343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Report of the editors--2015. Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 27059160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing the JIF of mycoses: a challenge with several facets. Korting HC Mycoses; 2007 Sep; 50(5):331. PubMed ID: 17714355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fate of manuscripts rejected by Intensive Care Medicine from 2013 to 2016: a follow-up analysis. Citerio G; Deutsch E; Sala E; Lavillonnière M; Perner A; Jaber S; Timsit JF; Azoulay E Intensive Care Med; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2300-2301. PubMed ID: 30298204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Making an impact: research, publications, and bibliometrics in the BJGP. Jones R; Green E; Hull C; Niesner E; Schofield P Br J Gen Pract; 2012 Mar; 62(596):157-9. PubMed ID: 22429430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the impact factor. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Literature citations in the Internet era. Gingras Y; Larivière V; Archambault E Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5910):36; author reply 37-8. PubMed ID: 19119197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. BJCVS has record access in 2013. Braile DM Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2014; 29(1):I-III. PubMed ID: 24896173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. To each citation, a purpose. Von Bartheld CS; Collin SP; Güntürkün O Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5910):36-7. PubMed ID: 19119199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whatever happened to the 50 most frequently cited articles published in AJR? Bui-Mansfield LT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Sep; 185(3):597-601. PubMed ID: 16120905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Most-downloaded abstracts and full-text views in 2005: a top-12 survey. Acta Radiol; 2006 Dec; 47(10):1005-6. PubMed ID: 17134999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]