169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26834271)
1. Bacterial probiotics as an aid in the control of Clostridium difficile disease in neonatal pigs.
Arruda PH; Madson DM; Ramirez A; Rowe EW; Songer JG
Can Vet J; 2016 Feb; 57(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 26834271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-toxigenic strain of Clostridioides difficile Z31 reduces the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) in one-day-old piglets on a commercial pig farm.
Oliveira Júnior CA; Silva ROS; Lage AP; Coura FM; Ramos CP; Alfieri AA; Guedes RMC; Lobato FCF
Vet Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 231():1-6. PubMed ID: 30955794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The non-toxigenic strain of Clostridioides difficile Z31 can prevent infection by C. difficile in experimental model piglets.
Oliveira Júnior CA; Silva ROS; Cruz DSG; Pires IH; Guedes RMC; Faria Lobato FC
Anaerobe; 2019 Feb; 55():24-28. PubMed ID: 30292822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of age, dose and antibiotic therapy on the development of Clostridium difficile infection in neonatal piglets.
Arruda PH; Madson DM; Ramirez A; Rowe E; Lizer JT; Songer JG
Anaerobe; 2013 Aug; 22():104-10. PubMed ID: 23624068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Formula Feeding Predisposes Neonatal Piglets to Clostridium difficile Gut Infection.
Grzeskowiak L; Martínez-Vallespín B; Dadi TH; Radloff J; Amasheh S; Heinsen FA; Franke A; Reinert K; Vahjen W; Zentek J; Pieper R
J Infect Dis; 2018 Apr; 217(9):1442-1452. PubMed ID: 29099941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention of porcine Clostridium difficile-associated disease by competitive exclusion with nontoxigenic organisms.
Songer JG; Jones R; Anderson MA; Barbara AJ; Post KW; Trinh HT
Vet Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 124(3-4):358-61. PubMed ID: 17493774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, case control study evaluating the association between Clostridium difficile toxins in the colon of neonatal swine and gross and microscopic lesions.
Yaeger MJ; Kinyon JM; Glenn Songer J
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2007 Jan; 19(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 17459832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence and diversity of toxigenic Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile among swine herds in the midwest.
Baker AA; Davis E; Rehberger T; Rosener D
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 May; 76(9):2961-7. PubMed ID: 20208029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-toxigenic
Gerding DN; Sambol SP; Johnson S
Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():1700. PubMed ID: 30093897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile isolated from piglets.
Putsathit P; Neela VK; Joseph NMS; Ooi PT; Ngamwongsatit B; Knight DR; Riley TV
Vet Microbiol; 2019 Oct; 237():108408. PubMed ID: 31585650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic piglets.
Alvarez-Perez S; Blanco JL; Bouza E; Alba P; Gibert X; Maldonado J; Garcia ME
Vet Microbiol; 2009 Jun; 137(3-4):302-5. PubMed ID: 19200665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Administration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial.
Gerding DN; Meyer T; Lee C; Cohen SH; Murthy UK; Poirier A; Van Schooneveld TC; Pardi DS; Ramos A; Barron MA; Chen H; Villano S
JAMA; 2015 May; 313(17):1719-27. PubMed ID: 25942722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative genomic analysis of toxin-negative strains of Clostridium difficile from humans and animals with symptoms of gastrointestinal disease.
Roy Chowdhury P; DeMaere M; Chapman T; Worden P; Charles IG; Darling AE; Djordjevic SP
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Mar; 16():41. PubMed ID: 26971047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 046 is common among neonatal pigs and humans in Sweden.
Norén T; Johansson K; Unemo M
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Jan; 20(1):O2-6. PubMed ID: 23927574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neonatal Piglets Are Protected from Clostridioides difficile Infection by Age-Dependent Increase in Intestinal Microbial Diversity.
Proctor A; Cornick NA; Wang C; Mooyottu S; Arruda PA; Kobs K; Phillips GJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0124321. PubMed ID: 34550001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical and epidemiological review of non-toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Natarajan M; Walk ST; Young VB; Aronoff DM
Anaerobe; 2013 Aug; 22():1-5. PubMed ID: 23727391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mechanisms and safety of probiotics against toxigenic
Liu D; Zeng L; Yan Z; Jia J; Gao J; Wei Y
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2020 Oct; 18(10):967-975. PubMed ID: 32520637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal investigation of Clostridium difficile shedding in piglets.
Weese JS; Wakeford T; Reid-Smith R; Rousseau J; Friendship R
Anaerobe; 2010 Oct; 16(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 20708700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High prevalence of the epidemic Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 in Iberian free-range pigs.
Álvarez-Pérez S; Blanco JL; Peláez T; Astorga RJ; Harmanus C; Kuijper E; García ME
Res Vet Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):358-61. PubMed ID: 23876331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the extent of Clostridium difficile colonisation and toxin accumulation in sows and neonatal piglets.
Grześkowiak Ł; Zentek J; Vahjen W
Anaerobe; 2016 Aug; 40():5-9. PubMed ID: 27108595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
