These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26835524)

  • 21. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-year clinical evaluation of two flowable composites.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Maltezos MB; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jun; 41(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 20490392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cuspal movement related to different polymerization protocols.
    Piccioni MA; Baratto-Filho F; Kuga MC; Morais EC; Campos EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 24939260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
    Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatially resolved assessments of composite shrinkage in MOD restorations using a digital-image-correlation technique.
    Chuang SF; Chang CH; Chen TY
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 20951420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.
    Heintze SD; Monreal D; Peschke A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Restoring class II cavities with composite resin, utilising the bulk filling technique.
    Lally U
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 24812757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations Made of Different "Low-Shrinkage" Systems.
    Shahidi C; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):273-283. PubMed ID: 28467259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations?
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Barink M; Verdonschot N
    J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 14630896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material.
    Fráter M; Forster A; Keresztúri M; Braunitzer G; Nagy K
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 8708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simplified techniques for the placement of stratified polychromatic anterior and posterior direct composite restorations.
    Blank JT
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 Feb; 24(2 Suppl):19-25. PubMed ID: 12793209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of novel "super-closed" sandwich composite resin restorations in large MOD defects.
    Magne P; Silva S; Andrada Md; Maia H
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 26835525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
    Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Posterior composites: a practical guide revisited.
    Mackenzie L; Burke FJ; Shortall AC
    Dent Update; 2012 Apr; 39(3):211-2, 215-6. PubMed ID: 22675892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.