1847 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26835725)
1. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood flow dynamics in saccular aneurysm models of the basilar artery.
Valencia AA; Guzmán AM; Finol EA; Amon CH
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 16813443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk.
Xiang J; Tremmel M; Kolega J; Levy EI; Natarajan SK; Meng H
J Neurointerv Surg; 2012 Sep; 4(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 21990529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local hemodynamics at the rupture point of cerebral aneurysms determined by computational fluid dynamics analysis.
Omodaka S; Sugiyama S; Inoue T; Funamoto K; Fujimura M; Shimizu H; Hayase T; Takahashi A; Tominaga T
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012; 34(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 22965244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions.
Evju Ø; Valen-Sendstad K; Mardal KA
J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2802-8. PubMed ID: 24099744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms with Concomitant Ophthalmic Artery Infundibulum in a Patient-Specific Model.
Ba D; Zhu Z; Yue X; Xu P; Yan P; Xiao D
World Neurosurg; 2019 May; 125():e1023-e1033. PubMed ID: 30771545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic and morphological characteristics of a growing cerebral aneurysm.
Dabagh M; Nair P; Gounley J; Frakes D; Gonzalez LF; Randles A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E13. PubMed ID: 31261117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Hemodynamic analyses of large intracranial aneurysms].
Wu J; Liu A; Fu C; Zhao Y; Qian Z; Kang H; Peng T; Wu Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jul; 94(25):1921-4. PubMed ID: 25253001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wall Shear Stress Estimation of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Febina J; Sikkandar MY; Sudharsan NM
Comput Math Methods Med; 2018; 2018():7126532. PubMed ID: 30008797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncertainty quantification of wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysms using a data-driven statistical model of systemic blood flow variability.
Sarrami-Foroushani A; Lassila T; Gooya A; Geers AJ; Frangi AF
J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):3815-3823. PubMed ID: 28573970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the influence of inlet boundary conditions on computational fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms: a virtual experiment.
Pereira VM; Brina O; Marcos Gonzales A; Narata AP; Bijlenga P; Schaller K; Lovblad KO; Ouared R
J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(9):1531-9. PubMed ID: 23602597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability of hemodynamic parameters using the common viscosity assumption in a computational fluid dynamics analysis of intracranial aneurysms.
Suzuki T; Takao H; Suzuki T; Suzuki T; Masuda S; Dahmani C; Watanabe M; Mamori H; Ishibashi T; Yamamoto H; Yamamoto M; Murayama Y
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 27497460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients.
Wells DR; Archie JP; Kleinstreuer C
J Vasc Surg; 1996 Apr; 23(4):667-78. PubMed ID: 8627904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-Newtonian versus numerical rheology: Practical impact of shear-thinning on the prediction of stable and unstable flows in intracranial aneurysms.
Khan MO; Steinman DA; Valen-Sendstad K
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Jul; 33(7):. PubMed ID: 27696717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peak systolic or maximum intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic condition? Implications on normalized flow variables.
Morales HG; Bonnefous O
J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2362-70. PubMed ID: 24861633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct numerical simulation of transitional flow in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm.
Valen-Sendstad K; Mardal KA; Mortensen M; Reif BA; Langtangen HP
J Biomech; 2011 Nov; 44(16):2826-32. PubMed ID: 21924724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence for non-Newtonian behavior of intracranial blood flow from Doppler ultrasonography measurements.
Saqr KM; Mansour O; Tupin S; Hassan T; Ohta M
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 May; 57(5):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 30523533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How patient-specific do internal carotid artery inflow rates need to be for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms?
Najafi M; Cancelliere NM; Brina O; Bouillot P; Vargas MI; Delattre BM; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 May; 13(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 32732256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
