These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26835925)

  • 1. Three-dimensional ray-tracing model for the study of advanced refractive errors in keratoconus.
    Schedin S; Hallberg P; Behndig A
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jan; 55(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 26835925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of an intraocular lens for correction of advanced corneal refractive errors.
    Wadbro E; Hallberg P; Schedin S
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jun; 55(16):4378-82. PubMed ID: 27411190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refractive correction method for digital charge-coupled device-recorded Scheimpflug photographs by means of ray tracing.
    Fink W
    J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(2):024003. PubMed ID: 15910077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular lens power calculation in cases with posterior keratoconus.
    Tamaoki A; Kojima T; Hasegawa A; Nakamura H; Tanaka K; Ichikawa K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2190-5. PubMed ID: 26703295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ray-tracing method and thin-lens formula in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Jin H; Rabsilber T; Ehmer A; Borkenstein AF; Limberger IJ; Guo H; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):650-62. PubMed ID: 19304085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence and topographical characteristics of keratoconus in patients with refractive errors in the Egyptian delta.
    Elbedewy HA; Wasfy TE; Soliman SS; Sabry MM; Awara AM; El Emam SY; Shafik HM; Alam MR
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1459-1465. PubMed ID: 29938312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in anterior and posterior corneal parameters in patients with keratoconus after intrastromal corneal-ring segment implantation.
    Rho CR; Na KS; Yoo YS; Pandey C; Park CW; Joo CK
    Curr Eye Res; 2013 Aug; 38(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 23806046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of Scheimpflug corneal anterior-posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation.
    Miyata K; Otani S; Honbou N; Minami K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e546-9. PubMed ID: 23890181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential complications of ocular surgery in patients with coexistent keratoconus and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.
    Jurkunas U; Azar DT
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2187-97. PubMed ID: 16996603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for keratoconus suspects among candidates for refractive surgery.
    McMonnies CW
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):492-8. PubMed ID: 25331075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.
    Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical image performance with customized aspheric and spherical IOLs - when do we get a benefit from customized aspheric design?
    Langenbucher A; Janunts E; Seitz B; Kannengießer M; Eppig T
    Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 23746689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices.
    Randleman JB; Akhtar J; Lynn MJ; Ambrósio R; Dupps WJ; Krueger RR; Klyce SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Feb; 41(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 25537685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The significance of Vogt's striae in keratoconus as evaluated by in vivo confocal microscopy.
    Mocan MC; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M; Orhan M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 36(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 18700919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
    Prospero Ponce CM; Rocha KM; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19465292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of long-term visual quality with numerical 3D ray tracing after corneal crosslinking treatment.
    Schedin S; Hallberg P; Behndig A
    Appl Opt; 2017 Dec; 56(35):9787-9792. PubMed ID: 29240126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterior chamber characteristics of keratoconus assessed by rotating Scheimpflug imaging.
    Kovács I; Miháltz K; Németh J; Nagy ZZ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1101-6. PubMed ID: 20610086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurements.
    Minami K; Kataoka Y; Matsunaga J; Ohtani S; Honbou M; Miyata K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1758-63. PubMed ID: 22857986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular lens power calculations in a patient with posterior keratoconus.
    Park DY; Lim DH; Chung TY; Chung ES
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):708-11. PubMed ID: 23449479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
    Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.