785 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26836059)
1. Recent progress in stem cell differentiation directed by material and mechanical cues.
Lin X; Shi Y; Cao Y; Liu W
Biomed Mater; 2016 Feb; 11(1):014109. PubMed ID: 26836059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Engineering articular cartilage with spatially-varying matrix composition and mechanical properties from a single stem cell population using a multi-layered hydrogel.
Nguyen LH; Kudva AK; Saxena NS; Roy K
Biomaterials; 2011 Oct; 32(29):6946-52. PubMed ID: 21723599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Union is strength: matrix elasticity and microenvironmental factors codetermine stem cell differentiation fate.
Lv H; Li L; Zhang Y; Chen Z; Sun M; Xu T; Tian L; Lu M; Ren M; Liu Y; Li Y
Cell Tissue Res; 2015 Sep; 361(3):657-68. PubMed ID: 25956590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Research status of mechanical stimulation of stem cells differentiation in stem cells microenvironment].
Cui S; Zhao W; Yu S; Xing G; Zhao F
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 28(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 24693789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regenerative potential of decellularized porcine nucleus pulposus hydrogel scaffolds: stem cell differentiation, matrix remodeling, and biocompatibility studies.
Mercuri JJ; Patnaik S; Dion G; Gill SS; Liao J; Simionescu DT
Tissue Eng Part A; 2013 Apr; 19(7-8):952-66. PubMed ID: 23140227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polysaccharide nanofibers with variable compliance for directing cell fate.
Jiang X; Nai MH; Lim CT; Le Visage C; Chan JK; Chew SY
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2015 Mar; 103(3):959-68. PubMed ID: 24853353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs.
Das S; Pati F; Choi YJ; Rijal G; Shim JH; Kim SW; Ray AR; Cho DW; Ghosh S
Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():233-46. PubMed ID: 25242654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidance of stem cell fate on 2D patterned surfaces.
Kolind K; Leong KW; Besenbacher F; Foss M
Biomaterials; 2012 Oct; 33(28):6626-33. PubMed ID: 22748769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nanotopography/mechanical induction of stem-cell differentiation.
Teo BK; Ankam S; Chan LY; Yim EK
Methods Cell Biol; 2010; 98():241-94. PubMed ID: 20816238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stem cell differentiation depending on different surfaces.
Kress S; Neumann A; Weyand B; Kasper C
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2012; 126():263-83. PubMed ID: 22068841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells in agarose, alginate, and gelatin scaffolds.
Awad HA; Wickham MQ; Leddy HA; Gimble JM; Guilak F
Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(16):3211-22. PubMed ID: 14980416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D Scaffolds with Different Stiffness but the Same Microstructure for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Chen G; Dong C; Yang L; Lv Y
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jul; 7(29):15790-802. PubMed ID: 26151287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subcellular cell geometry on micropillars regulates stem cell differentiation.
Liu X; Liu R; Cao B; Ye K; Li S; Gu Y; Pan Z; Ding J
Biomaterials; 2016 Dec; 111():27-39. PubMed ID: 27716524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational modelling of cell spreading and tissue regeneration in porous scaffolds.
Sengers BG; Taylor M; Please CP; Oreffo RO
Biomaterials; 2007 Apr; 28(10):1926-40. PubMed ID: 17178156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem cell microenvironments--unveiling the secret of how stem cell fate is defined.
Votteler M; Kluger PJ; Walles H; Schenke-Layland K
Macromol Biosci; 2010 Nov; 10(11):1302-15. PubMed ID: 20715131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactions between structural and chemical biomimetism in synthetic stem cell niches.
Nava MM; Raimondi MT; Credi C; De Marco C; Turri S; Cerullo G; Osellame R
Biomed Mater; 2015 Jan; 10(1):015012. PubMed ID: 25594262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of matrix composition of 3D constructs on embryonic stem cell differentiation.
Battista S; Guarnieri D; Borselli C; Zeppetelli S; Borzacchiello A; Mayol L; Gerbasio D; Keene DR; Ambrosio L; Netti PA
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(31):6194-207. PubMed ID: 15921736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microtopographical cues in 3D attenuate fibrotic phenotype and extracellular matrix deposition: implications for tissue regeneration.
Ayala P; Lopez JI; Desai TA
Tissue Eng Part A; 2010 Aug; 16(8):2519-27. PubMed ID: 20235832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-dependent cellular morphogenesis and matrix stiffening in proteolytically responsive hydrogels.
Kesselman D; Kossover O; Mironi-Harpaz I; Seliktar D
Acta Biomater; 2013 Aug; 9(8):7630-9. PubMed ID: 23624218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biophysical signals controlling cell fate decisions: how do stem cells really feel?
Costa P; Almeida FV; Connelly JT
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2012 Dec; 44(12):2233-7. PubMed ID: 22982240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
