162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26836200)
1. Contaminant source reconstruction by empirical Bayes and Akaike's Bayesian Information Criterion.
Zanini A; Woodbury AD
J Contam Hydrol; 2016; 185-186():74-86. PubMed ID: 26836200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contaminant point source localization error estimates as functions of data quantity and model quality.
Hansen SK; Vesselinov VV
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Oct; 193():74-85. PubMed ID: 27639975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parallel heuristic search strategy based on a Bayesian approach for simultaneous recognition of contaminant sources and aquifer parameters at DNAPL-contaminated sites.
Lu W; Wang H; Li J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):37134-37148. PubMed ID: 32583106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian maximum entropy-based methodology for optimal spatiotemporal design of groundwater monitoring networks.
Hosseini M; Kerachian R
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Sep; 189(9):433. PubMed ID: 28779429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of point-source pollutant loadings to soil and groundwater for 72 chemical substances.
Yu S; Hwang SI; Yun ST; Chae G; Lee D; Kim KE
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):24816-24843. PubMed ID: 28913678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian modeling approach for characterizing groundwater arsenic contamination in the Mekong River basin.
Cha Y; Kim YM; Choi JW; Sthiannopkao S; Cho KH
Chemosphere; 2016 Jan; 143():50-6. PubMed ID: 25796421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dilution and volatilization of groundwater contaminant discharges in streams.
Aisopou A; Bjerg PL; Sonne AT; Balbarini N; Rosenberg L; Binning PJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():71-83. PubMed ID: 25496819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Kriging surrogate model coupled in simulation-optimization approach for identifying release history of groundwater sources.
Zhao Y; Lu W; Xiao C
J Contam Hydrol; 2016; 185-186():51-60. PubMed ID: 26826982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Multiple Data Assimilation Techniques in Groundwater Contaminant Transport Modeling.
Rajib AI; Assumaning GA; Chang SY; Addai EB
Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1952-1960. PubMed ID: 29080564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contaminant source identification using semi-supervised machine learning.
Vesselinov VV; Alexandrov BS; O'Malley D
J Contam Hydrol; 2018 May; 212():134-142. PubMed ID: 29174719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fate of arsenic, phosphate and ammonium plumes in a coastal aquifer affected by saltwater intrusion.
Colombani N; Mastrocicco M; Prommer H; Sbarbati C; Petitta M
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Aug; 179():116-31. PubMed ID: 26093106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nitrate source identification in groundwater of multiple land-use areas by combining isotopes and multivariate statistical analysis: A case study of Asopos basin (Central Greece).
Matiatos I
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():802-814. PubMed ID: 26437351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of mass depletion-mass flux reduction relationships during pumping to determine source zone mass of a reactive brominated-solvent DNAPL.
Johnston CD; Davis GB; Bastow TP; Annable MD; Trefry MG; Furness A; Geste Y; Woodbury RJ; Rao PS; Rhodes S
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jan; 144(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 23247401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Highly parameterized inversion of groundwater reactive transport for a complex field site.
Carniato L; Schoups G; van de Giesen N; Seuntjens P; Bastiaens L; Sapion H
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Feb; 173():38-58. PubMed ID: 25528244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of deep vadose zone contaminant flux into groundwater: Approach and case study.
Oostrom M; Truex MJ; Last GV; Strickland CE; Tartakovsky GD
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Jun; 189():27-43. PubMed ID: 27107320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran.
Mirzaei R; Sakizadeh M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2758-69. PubMed ID: 26446732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential optimal monitoring network design and iterative spatial estimation of pollutant concentration for identification of unknown groundwater pollution source locations.
Prakash O; Datta B
Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Jul; 185(7):5611-26. PubMed ID: 23229277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the effectiveness of a geostatistical approach with groundwater flow modeling for three-dimensional estimation of a contaminant plume.
Takai S; Shimada T; Takeda S; Koike K
J Contam Hydrol; 2022 Dec; 251():104097. PubMed ID: 36302322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computationally efficient approach for identification of fuzzy dynamic groundwater sampling network.
Kumari K; Jain S; Dhar A
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Apr; 191(5):310. PubMed ID: 31030264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
