These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26836696)

  • 21. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: A three-year follow-up.
    Chen Y; Chen H; Wu X; Wang X; Lin W; Yuan W
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 May; 144():72-6. PubMed ID: 26999528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.
    Powell JW; Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA; Hipp JA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20051921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.
    Li Z; Yu S; Zhao Y; Hou S; Fu Q; Li F; Hou T; Zhong H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 21(6):942-8. PubMed ID: 24411326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
    Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 0.5- to 1-Fold Intervertebral Distraction Is a Protective Factor for Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Xiong W; Zhou J; Sun C; Chen Z; Guo X; Huo X; Liu S; Li J; Xue Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jan; 45(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 31425433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical artificial disc replacement with ProDisc-C: clinical and radiographic outcomes with long-term follow-up.
    Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Chan PG; Varma D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 21(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 24417795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Threaded interbody fusion cage for adjacent segment degenerative disease after previous anterior cervical fusion.
    Arnold P; Boswell S; McMahon J
    Surg Neurol; 2008 Oct; 70(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 18291503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical cages placed bilaterally in the facet joints from a posterior approach significantly increase foraminal area.
    Siemionow K; Janusz P; Glowka P
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2279-85. PubMed ID: 26869077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes.
    Li J; Li Y; Kong F; Zhang D; Zhang Y; Shen Y
    J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 22(3):566-9. PubMed ID: 25487176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
    Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical disk arthroplasty versus ACDF for preoperative reducible kyphosis.
    Chen Y; Wang X; Lu X; Yang H; Chen D
    Orthopedics; 2013 Jul; 36(7):e958-65. PubMed ID: 23823056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of adjacent segment degeneration in and between patients treated with anterior or posterior cervical simple discectomy.
    Acikbas SC; Ermol C; Akyuz M; Tuncer R
    Turk Neurosurg; 2010 Jul; 20(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 20669106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does Hybrid Surgery Improve Quality of Life in Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disk Disease? Five-Year Follow-up Study.
    Grasso G; Sallì M; Torregrossa F
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():527-533. PubMed ID: 32797985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Jagannathan J; Sherman JH; Szabo T; Shaffrey CI; Jane JA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 19441994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials.
    Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Kerr EJ; Gordon CJ; Cavanaugh DA; Birdsong EM; Stocks M; Danielson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 21587111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adjacent Segment Disease After Cervical Spine Fusion: Evaluation of a 70 Patient Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Alhashash M; Shousha M; Boehm H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 May; 43(9):605-609. PubMed ID: 28816821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The angular profile of a cage has no influence on segmental alignment after anterior cervical stand-alone interbody fusion].
    Barsa P; Elgawhary S; Hradil J; Sercl M; Suchomel P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 25137499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.