99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2683677)
1. Detection of hepatic metastases with MR imaging: spin-echo vs phase-contrast pulse sequences at 0.6 T.
Rummeny E; Saini S; Stark DD; Weissleder R; Compton CC; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Dec; 153(6):1207-11. PubMed ID: 2683677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of liver metastases at 1.5 T: similar contrast discrimination with T1- and T2-weighted pulse sequences.
Saini S; Li W; Wallner B; Hahn PF; Edelman RR
Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 1924787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short TI inversion-recovery imaging of the liver: pulse-sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo imaging.
Dousset M; Weissleder R; Hendrick RE; Stark DD; Fretz CJ; Elizondo G; Hahn PF; Saini S; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 2704797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of hepatic metastases caused by neuroendocrine tumors: comparing four techniques.
Dromain C; de Baere T; Baudin E; Galline J; Ducreux M; Boige V; Duvillard P; Laplanche A; Caillet H; Lasser P; Schlumberger M; Sigal R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 12490490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Echoplanar MR imaging of the liver in patients with focal hepatic lesions: quantitative analysis of images made with various pulse sequences.
Saini S; Reimer P; Hahn PF; Cohen MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1389-93. PubMed ID: 7992735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hepatic lesion detection after superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement: comparison of five T2-weighted sequences at 1.0 T by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Ward J; Chen F; Guthrie JA; Wilson D; Lodge JP; Wyatt JI; Robinson PJ
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 10644117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast optimization for the detection of focal hepatic lesions by MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Foley WD; Kneeland JB; Cates JD; Kellman GM; Lawson TL; Middleton WD; Hendrick RE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3500602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Low flip-angle spin-echo imaging of the liver. Basic study and its application to hepatic space-occupying lesions].
Yasui K; Sugimura K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep; 51(9):1017-26. PubMed ID: 1658732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of breath-hold fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences for T2-weighted MR imaging of liver lesions.
Rydberg JN; Lomas DJ; Coakley KJ; Hough DM; Ehman RL; Riederer SJ
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 7824723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of hepatic metastases: analysis of pulse sequence performance in MR imaging.
Stark DD; Wittenberg J; Edelman RR; Middleton MS; Saini S; Butch RJ; Brady TJ; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 3008212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liver metastases: detection by phase-contrast MR imaging.
Stark DD; Wittenberg J; Middleton MS; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1986 Feb; 158(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 3941859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen: should fat suppression be used routinely?
Lu DS; Saini S; Hahn PF; Goldberg M; Lee MJ; Weissleder R; Gerard B; Halpern E; Cats A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1095-100. PubMed ID: 8165989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addition of gadolinium chelates to heavily T2-weighted MR imaging: limited role in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from metastases.
Bennett GL; Petersein A; Mayo-Smith WW; Hahn PF; Schima W; Saini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Feb; 174(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 10658728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does T2-weighted MR imaging improve preoperative detection of malignant hepatic tumors? Observer performance study in 49 surgically proven cases.
Kondo H; Kanematsu M; Itoh K; Ito K; Maetani Y; Goshima S; Matsuo M; Matsunaga N; Konishi J; Hoshi H; Moriyama N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jan; 23(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15733793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of inversion-recovery gradient- and spin-echo and fast spin-echo techniques in the detection and characterization of liver lesions.
Pijl ME; Wasser MN; van Persijn van Meerten EL; Gratama JW; van de Velde CJ; Hermans J; Elevelt A; Bloem JL
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):427-34. PubMed ID: 9807569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metastases in fatty liver: appearance on conventional spin-echo, fast-spin-echo, and echo-planar T2-weighted MR images.
Kanematsu M; Hoshi H; Kunieda K; Nandate Y; Kato M; Yokoyama R
Radiat Med; 1998; 16(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 9715995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
