These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26836967)
1. Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants. Kludt E; Büchner A; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():185-190. PubMed ID: 26836967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss. Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss: Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System]. Lenarz T; Schwab B; Maier H; Kludt E HNO; 2014 Jul; 62(7):481-9. PubMed ID: 25056645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subtotal petrosectomy and Codacs™: new possibilities in ears with chronic infection. Schwab B; Kludt E; Maier H; Lenarz T; Teschner M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1387-91. PubMed ID: 26092235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation. Wardenga N; Snik AFM; Kludt E; Waldmann B; Lenarz T; Maier H Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 32007992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation. Häusler R; Stieger C; Bernhard H; Kompis M Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant. Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant. Lenarz T; Zwartenkot JW; Stieger C; Schwab B; Mylanus EA; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Snik AF; D'hondt C; Mojallal H Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23921930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Codacs™ direct acoustic cochlear implant actuator: exploring alternative stimulation sites and their stimulation efficiency. Grossöhmichen M; Salcher R; Kreipe HH; Lenarz T; Maier H PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119601. PubMed ID: 25785860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss. Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First clinical experiences with a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator in comparison to preoperative fitted conventional hearing aids. Busch S; Kruck S; Spickers D; Leuwer R; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Plinkert PK; Mojallal H; Schwab B; Maier H; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1711-8. PubMed ID: 24232068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implants Lead to an Improved Speech Perception Gap Compared to Conventional Hearing Aid. Maier H; Lenarz T; Dolležal LV; Busch S Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):1147-1152. PubMed ID: 30106855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to cochlea round window: auditory results in patients with mixed hearing loss. Beltrame AM; Martini A; Prosser S; Giarbini N; Streitberger C Otol Neurotol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 19180678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]