These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26837084)

  • 1. Family Relational Health, Psychological Resources, and Health Behaviors: A Dyadic Study of Military Couples.
    O'Neal CW; Lucier-Greer M; Mancini JA; Ferraro AJ; Ross DB
    Mil Med; 2016 Feb; 181(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 26837084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextualizing the Psychosocial Well-being of Military Members and Their Partners: The Importance of Community and Relationship Provisions.
    O'Neal CW; Mancini JA; DeGraff A
    Am J Community Psychol; 2016 Dec; 58(3-4):477-487. PubMed ID: 27808420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Military-related stress, self-efficacy, and anxiety: Investigating the role of marital quality in military couples.
    Lucier-Greer M; Frye-Cox N; Reed-Fitzke K; Ferraro AJ; Mancini JA
    Fam Process; 2023 Sep; 62(3):1253-1271. PubMed ID: 36305360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Yours, mine, or ours? Dyadic sleep hygiene and associations with sleep quality, emotional distress, and conflict frequency in mixed-gender, bed-sharing couples.
    Novak JR; Miller KC; Gunn HE; Troxel WM
    J Sleep Res; 2024 May; 33(3):e14047. PubMed ID: 37749792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Community, Context, and Coping: How Social Connections Influence Coping and Well-Being for Military Members and Their Spouses.
    O'Neal CW; Richardson EW; Mancini JA
    Fam Process; 2020 Mar; 59(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 30294836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathways of Risk and Resilience: Impact of a Family Resilience Program on Active-Duty Military Parents.
    Saltzman WR; Lester P; Milburn N; Woodward K; Stein J
    Fam Process; 2016 Dec; 55(4):633-646. PubMed ID: 27597440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Couples Coping Through Deployment: Findings From a Sample of National Guard Families.
    Blow AJ; Bowles RP; Farero A; Subramaniam S; Lappan S; Nichols E; Gorman L; Kees M; Guty D
    J Clin Psychol; 2017 Dec; 73(12):1753-1767. PubMed ID: 28493557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Couples coping with sensory loss: A dyadic study of the roles of self- and perceived partner acceptance.
    Lehane CM; Nielsen T; Wittich W; Langer S; Dammeyer J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Sep; 23(3):646-664. PubMed ID: 29602197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk and resilience in military families experiencing deployment: the role of the family attachment network.
    Riggs SA; Riggs DS
    J Fam Psychol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):675-87. PubMed ID: 21875201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Battling on the Home Front: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Conflict Behavior Among Military Couples.
    Knobloch-Fedders LM; Caska-Wallace C; Smith TW; Renshaw K
    Behav Ther; 2017 Mar; 48(2):247-261. PubMed ID: 28270334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mental health symptoms and the reintegration difficulty of military couples following deployment: A longitudinal application of the relational turbulence model.
    Knobloch LK; Knobloch-Fedders LM; Yorgason JB
    J Clin Psychol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):742-765. PubMed ID: 30569467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological distress and communication quality in military couples after deployment to war.
    Zamir O; Gewirtz AH; Cheng CH; Zhang N; Lavee Y
    J Fam Psychol; 2020 Jun; 34(4):383-391. PubMed ID: 31424234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of relational mutuality on dyadic coping among couples facing breast cancer.
    Kayser K; Acquati C
    J Psychosoc Oncol; 2019; 37(2):194-212. PubMed ID: 30822220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Family resilience, perceived social support, and individual resilience in cancer couples: Analysis using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model.
    Chen JJ; Wang QL; Li HP; Zhang T; Zhang SS; Zhou MK
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2021 Jun; 52():101932. PubMed ID: 33799020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An introduction to the special section on U.S. military operations: effects on military members' partners and children.
    Kelley ML; Jouriles EN
    J Fam Psychol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):459-60. PubMed ID: 21842993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Military couples' childhood experiences and romantic relationship satisfaction: The role of accepting influence.
    Peterson C; O'Neal CW; Futris TG
    Fam Process; 2022 Jun; 61(2):689-704. PubMed ID: 34189784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between perceptions of relationship quality and markers of inflammation and insulin resistance among couples coping with cancer.
    Skiba MB; Dieckmann NF; Lyons KS; Winters-Stone KM
    J Cancer Surviv; 2023 Aug; 17(4):957-966. PubMed ID: 36435952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Everything else comes first": a mixed-methods analysis of barriers to health behaviors among military spouses.
    Mailey EL; Mershon C; Joyce J; Irwin BC
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):1013. PubMed ID: 30111307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intimate Partner Violence in the Canadian Armed Forces: The Role of Family Stress and Its Impact on Well-Being.
    Skomorovsky A; Hujaleh F; Wolejszo S
    Mil Med; 2015 Jul; 180(7):809-16. PubMed ID: 26126253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Couple communication quality and family resilience among Chinese gynecologic cancer patients and their spouses: a dyadic study.
    Chen X; Xu X; Wang T; Qiu C; Li M
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Apr; 31(5):271. PubMed ID: 37060357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.