These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26837386)
1. Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2. Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Bar J; Kovo M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 294(4):725-30. PubMed ID: 26837386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study. Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW; Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vaginal dinoprostone vs Foley catheter for induction of labor at term with an unfavorable cervix: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Liu X; Huang D; Liu Y; Qu C; Mo H; Zhao X; Li W; Mol BW; Shen H; Cheng W; Ying H Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Sep; 6(9):101436. PubMed ID: 39096968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial. Eser A; Ozkaya E; Abide CY; Eser T; Eser GY; Abike F; Tayyar AT; Eroglu M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 30536117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter. Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix. Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Sharma C; Jaryal S; Soni A Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101026. PubMed ID: 37211088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis. Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extra-amniotic Foley catheter and prostaglandin E(2) gel for cervical ripening at term gestation. Ghezzi F; Massimo F; Raio L; Di Naro E; Balestreri D; Bolis P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Aug; 97(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 11451546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section. Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent. Athiel Y; Crequit S; Bongiorno M; Sanyan S; Renevier B J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101834. PubMed ID: 32585393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor]. Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Barda G; Ganer Herman H; Sagiv R; Bar J J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Oct; 31(20):2777-2781. PubMed ID: 28764579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. Henry A; Madan A; Reid R; Tracy SK; Austin K; Welsh A; Challis D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():25. PubMed ID: 23356673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Chang CH; Chang FM J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]