558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26838567)
1. Assessing clinical reasoning abilities of medical students using clinical performance examination.
Im S; Kim DK; Kong HH; Roh HR; Oh YR; Seo JH
Korean J Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 28(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 26838567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between medical students' epistemological beliefs and achievement on a clinical performance examination.
Oh SA; Chung EK; Han ER; Woo YJ; Kevin D
Korean J Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 28(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26838566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical students' clinical performance of dealing with patients in the context of domestic violence.
Kong HH; Im S; Seo JH; Kim DK; Roh H
Korean J Med Educ; 2018 Mar; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29510606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How do medical students actually think while solving problems in three different types of clinical assessments in Korea: Clinical performance examination (CPX), multimedia case-based assessment (CBA), and modified essay question (MEQ).
Kim S; Choi I; Yoon BY; Kwon MJ; Choi SJ; Kim SH; Lee JT; Rhee BD
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():10. PubMed ID: 31071764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance.
Shirazi M; Labaf A; Monjazebi F; Jalili M; Mirzazadeh M; Ponzer S; Masiello I
Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 38(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 24777713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration of communication skills items in OSCE checklists according to the MAAS-Global.
Setyonugroho W; Kropmans T; Kennedy KM; Stewart B; van Dalen J
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jan; 99(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 26508594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verbal communication of students with high patient-physician interaction scores in a clinical performance examination assessed by standardized patients.
Roh H; Park KH; Park SY
Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 29(4):241-251. PubMed ID: 29207455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.
Van Nuland M; Van den Noortgate W; van der Vleuten C; Jo G
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 22322068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Nonclinician Raters Be Trained to Assess Clinical Reasoning in Postencounter Patient Notes?
Yudkowsky R; Hyderi A; Holden J; Kiser R; Stringham R; Gangopadhyaya A; Khan A; Park YS
Acad Med; 2019 Nov; 94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 31663941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The relationship between problem-based learning and clinical performance evaluations].
Oh SA; Chung EK; Han ER
Korean J Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 27(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 26330070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel 3-year longitudinal pilot study of medical students' acquisition and retention of screening eye examination skills.
Lippa LM; Boker J; Duke A; Amin A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jan; 113(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 16310854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot study on the evaluation of medical student documentation: assessment of SOAP notes.
Seo JH; Kong HH; Im SJ; Roh H; Kim DK; Bae HO; Oh YR
Korean J Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 28(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 26996436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential diagnosis in a 3-station acute abdominal pain objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): a needs assessment in third-year medical student performance and summative evaluation in the surgical clerkship.
Falcone JL; Watson GA
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 21708362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Score Reflect the Clinical Reasoning Ability of Medical Students?
Park WB; Kang SH; Lee YS; Myung SJ
Am J Med Sci; 2015 Jul; 350(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 25647834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using standardized patients versus video cases for representing clinical problems in problem-based learning.
Yoon BY; Choi I; Choi S; Kim TH; Roh H; Rhee BD; Lee JT
Korean J Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 26923094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
