645 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26839411)
1. Strand-biased cytosine deamination at the replication fork causes cytosine to thymine mutations in Escherichia coli.
Bhagwat AS; Hao W; Townes JP; Lee H; Tang H; Foster PL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Feb; 113(8):2176-81. PubMed ID: 26839411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genome-wide mapping of regions preferentially targeted by the human DNA-cytosine deaminase APOBEC3A using uracil-DNA pulldown and sequencing.
Sakhtemani R; Senevirathne V; Stewart J; Perera MLW; Pique-Regi R; Lawrence MS; Bhagwat AS
J Biol Chem; 2019 Oct; 294(41):15037-15051. PubMed ID: 31431505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competition for DNA binding between the genome protector replication protein A and the genome modifying APOBEC3 single-stranded DNA deaminases.
Wong L; Sami A; Chelico L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Nov; 50(21):12039-12057. PubMed ID: 36444883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visualization of uracils created by APOBEC3A using UdgX shows colocalization with RPA at stalled replication forks.
Stewart JA; Schauer G; Bhagwat AS
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Nov; 48(20):e118. PubMed ID: 33074285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative contribution of cytosine deamination and error-prone replication to the induction of propanodeoxyguanosine-->deoxyadenosine mutations in Escherichia coli.
Fink SP; Reddy GR; Marnett LJ
Chem Res Toxicol; 1996; 9(1):277-83. PubMed ID: 8924603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uracil DNA glycosylase counteracts APOBEC3G-induced hypermutation of hepatitis B viral genomes: excision repair of covalently closed circular DNA.
Kitamura K; Wang Z; Chowdhury S; Simadu M; Koura M; Muramatsu M
PLoS Pathog; 2013; 9(5):e1003361. PubMed ID: 23696735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accelerated deamination of cytosine residues in UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers leads to CC-->TT transitions.
Peng W; Shaw BR
Biochemistry; 1996 Aug; 35(31):10172-81. PubMed ID: 8756482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil.
Doseth B; Ekre C; Slupphaug G; Krokan HE; Kavli B
DNA Repair (Amst); 2012 Jun; 11(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 22483865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repair of APOBEC3G-Mutated Retroviral DNA
Salas-Briceno K; Ross SR
J Virol; 2021 Oct; 95(22):e0124421. PubMed ID: 34468176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HMCES Maintains Replication Fork Progression and Prevents Double-Strand Breaks in Response to APOBEC Deamination and Abasic Site Formation.
Mehta KPM; Lovejoy CA; Zhao R; Heintzman DR; Cortez D
Cell Rep; 2020 Jun; 31(9):107705. PubMed ID: 32492421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AID expression in B-cell lymphomas causes accumulation of genomic uracil and a distinct AID mutational signature.
Pettersen HS; Galashevskaya A; Doseth B; Sousa MM; Sarno A; Visnes T; Aas PA; Liabakk NB; Slupphaug G; Sætrom P; Kavli B; Krokan HE
DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Jan; 25():60-71. PubMed ID: 25486549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinetics of bisulfite-induced cytosine deamination in single-stranded DNA.
Chen H; Shaw BR
Biochemistry; 1993 Apr; 32(14):3535-9. PubMed ID: 8466898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Preferentially Deaminate the Lagging Strand Template during DNA Replication.
Hoopes JI; Cortez LM; Mertz TM; Malc EP; Mieczkowski PA; Roberts SA
Cell Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(6):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 26832400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RPA guides UNG to uracil in ssDNA to facilitate antibody class switching and repair of mutagenic uracil at the replication fork.
Hayran AB; Liabakk NB; Aas PA; Kusnierczyk A; Vågbø CB; Sarno A; Iveland TS; Chawla K; Zahn A; Di Noia JM; Slupphaug G; Kavli B
Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Jan; 52(2):784-800. PubMed ID: 38000394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetric Modification of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Genomes by an Endogenous Cytidine Deaminase inside HBV Cores Informs a Model of Reverse Transcription.
Nair S; Zlotnick A
J Virol; 2018 May; 92(10):. PubMed ID: 29491156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative determination of uracil residues in Escherichia coli DNA: Contribution of ung, dug, and dut genes to uracil avoidance.
Lari SU; Chen CY; Vertéssy BG; Morré J; Bennett SE
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Dec; 5(12):1407-20. PubMed ID: 16908222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of endonuclease III enzymes in uracil repair.
Yang Y; Park SH; Alford-Zappala M; Lee HW; Li J; Cunningham RP; Cao W
Mutat Res; 2019 Jan; 813():20-30. PubMed ID: 30590231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mutagenic deamination of cytosine residues in DNA.
Duncan BK; Miller JH
Nature; 1980 Oct; 287(5782):560-1. PubMed ID: 6999365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strand-biased spreading of mutations during somatic hypermutation.
Unniraman S; Schatz DG
Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5842):1227-30. PubMed ID: 17761884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro deamination of cytosine to uracil in single-stranded DNA by apolipoprotein B editing complex catalytic subunit 1 (APOBEC1).
Petersen-Mahrt SK; Neuberger MS
J Biol Chem; 2003 May; 278(22):19583-6. PubMed ID: 12697753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
