These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26840187)

  • 1. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: The effect of question design on student performance.
    Sagoo MG; Smith CF; Gosden E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 26840187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy.
    Shiozawa T; Butz B; Herlan S; Kramer A; Hirt B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27273871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A scoring framework for assessing anatomy competence of undergraduate preclinical students.
    Raubenheimer D; Raubenheimer JE; van Zyl S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 26588194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students.
    O'Mahony SM; Sbayeh A; Horgan M; O'Flynn S; O'Tuathaigh CM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 26845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy.
    Guimarães B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Online Assessment of Applied Anatomy Knowledge: The Effect of Images on Medical Students' Performance.
    Sagoo MG; Vorstenbosch MATM; Bazira PJ; Ellis H; Kambouri M; Owen C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 32289198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students.
    Doomernik DE; van Goor H; Kooloos JGM; Ten Broek RP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 27706913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do they know too little? An inter-institutional study on the anatomical knowledge of upper-year medical students based on multiple choice questions of a progress test.
    Brunk I; Schauber S; Georg W
    Ann Anat; 2017 Jan; 209():93-100. PubMed ID: 27746222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
    Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning and study strategies correlate with medical students' performance in anatomical sciences.
    Khalil MK; Williams SE; Gregory Hawkins H
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 28940743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practicing handoffs early: Applying a clinical framework in the anatomy laboratory.
    Lazarus MD; Dos Santos JA; Haidet PM; Whitcomb TL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):476-87. PubMed ID: 26849177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
    Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a 3D-MC examination format in anatomy.
    Steinborn A; Werner S; März M; Brunk I
    Ann Anat; 2021 Jul; 236():151666. PubMed ID: 33667594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The intelligent anatomy spotter: A new approach to incorporate higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy.
    Choudhury B; Gouldsborough I; Shaw FL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 26687931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Summative and Formative Style Anatomy Practical Examinations: Do They Have Impact on Students' Performance and Drive for Learning?
    Mogali SR; Rotgans JI; Rosby L; Ferenczi MA; Low Beer N
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):581-590. PubMed ID: 31733172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.