105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26841151)
1. Survey of Participation in Organised Cervical Cancer-Screening Programme in Hungary.
Gyulai A; Nagy A; Pataki V; Tonté D; Ádány R; Vokó Z
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2015 Dec; 23(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 26841151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. General practitioners can increase participation in cervical cancer screening - a model program in Hungary.
Gyulai A; Nagy A; Pataki V; Tonté D; Ádány R; Vokó Z
BMC Fam Pract; 2018 May; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 29778099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The coverage of cervical screening in Hungary].
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Kovács A; Budai A; Székely T
Orv Hetil; 2007 Nov; 148(46):2177-82. PubMed ID: 17988975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening programme in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia--the results of the pilot study.
Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Ostojić DV; Stemberger-Papić S; Janković S; Glibotić-Kresina H; Brncić-Fischer A; Benić-Salamon K
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 20437641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Participation in cervical cancer screening by age and region--a cohort study with a 3 1/2 year follow-up on 2,223,135 women in Bavaria.
Rückinger S; Tauscher M; Redel R; Munte A; Walchner-Bonjean M; Hess J; Schneider A; von Kries R
Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e17-21. PubMed ID: 18661453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark.
Kristensson JH; Sander BB; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 38(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 24447699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge and participation].
Bernard E; Saint-Lary O; Haboubi L; Le Breton J
Sante Publique; 2013; 25(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 24007901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with participation of Korean women in cervical cancer screening examination by age group.
Lee M; Chang HS; Park EC; Yu SH; Sohn M; Lee SG
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(6):1457-62. PubMed ID: 22126481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Socioeconomic factors affecting colorectal, breast and cervical cancer screening in an Asian urban low-income setting at baseline and post-intervention.
Wee LE; Koh GC; Chin RT; Yeo WX; Seow B; Chua D
Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 55(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 22561028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Socio-demographic characteristics of participation in the opportunistic German cervical cancer screening programme: results from the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort.
Seidel D; Becker N; Rohrmann S; Nimptsch K; Linseisen J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 135(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 18841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.
Nowakowski A; Cybulski M; Śliwczyński A; Chil A; Teter Z; Seroczyński P; Arbyn M; Anttila A
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():279. PubMed ID: 25879466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
de Jonge E; Cloes E; Op de Beeck L; Adriaens B; Lousbergh D; Orye GG; Buntinx F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The state of organized cervical screening program in Hungary in 2006].
Kovacs A; Dobrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
Orv Hetil; 2007 Mar; 148(12):535-40. PubMed ID: 17444018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical screening in Hungary: why does the "English model" work but the "Hungarian model" does not?
Kovács A; Döbrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 18386456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health-related factors associated with the participation in cervical cancer screening.
Schoofs J; Krijger K; Vandevoorde J; Rossem IV; Devroey D
J Res Health Sci; 2015; 15(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 25821019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
