BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26841367)

  • 1. Testing moderation in network meta-analysis with individual participant data.
    Dagne GA; Brown CH; Howe G; Kellam SG; Liu L
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2485-502. PubMed ID: 26841367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?
    Debray TP; Schuit E; Efthimiou O; Reitsma JB; Ioannidis JP; Salanti G; Moons KG;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1351-1364. PubMed ID: 27487843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for identifying treatment-covariate interactions in individual participant data network meta-analysis.
    Freeman SC; Fisher D; Tierney JF; Carpenter JR
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 29737630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Network Meta-Analysis.
    Watt J; Del Giovane C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():187-201. PubMed ID: 34550592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
    Efthimiou O; Debray TP; van Valkenhoef G; Trelle S; Panayidou K; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Shang A; Salanti G;
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):236-63. PubMed ID: 26754852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials.
    Singh J; Gsteiger S; Wheaton L; Riley RD; Abrams KR; Gillies CL; Bujkiewicz S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):186. PubMed ID: 35818035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of network meta-analysis in the field of physical activity and health promotion.
    Su X; McDonough DJ; Chu H; Quan M; Gao Z
    J Sport Health Sci; 2020 Dec; 9(6):511-520. PubMed ID: 32745617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network Meta-analysis on Disconnected Evidence Networks When Only Aggregate Data Are Available: Modified Methods to Include Disconnected Trials and Single-Arm Studies while Minimizing Bias.
    Thom H; Leahy J; Jansen JP
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Oct; 42(7):906-922. PubMed ID: 35531938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostics for generalized linear hierarchical models in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Carlin BP
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 28683516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A likelihood ratio test for the homogeneity of between-study variance in network meta-analysis.
    Hu D; Wang C; O'Connor AM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 10(1):310. PubMed ID: 34886897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the use of aggregate data and various methods of integrating individual patient data to network meta-analysis and its application to first-line ART.
    Kanters S; Karim ME; Thorlund K; Anis AH; Zoratti M; Bansback N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33784981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using individual participant data to improve network meta-analysis projects.
    Riley RD; Dias S; Donegan S; Tierney JF; Stewart LA; Efthimiou O; Phillippo DM
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 35948411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the impact of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Leahy J; Walsh C
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):546-568. PubMed ID: 31368653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthesizing cross-design evidence and cross-format data using network meta-regression.
    Hamza T; Chalkou K; Pellegrini F; Kuhle J; Benkert P; Lorscheider J; Zecca C; Iglesias-Urrutia CP; Manca A; Furukawa TA; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Mar; 14(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 36625736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.
    Hempel S; Miles JN; Booth MJ; Wang Z; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2():107. PubMed ID: 24286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional evidence network plot system: covariate imbalances and effects in network meta-analysis explored using a new software tool.
    Batson S; Score R; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():182-195. PubMed ID: 28344122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.