These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26841858)

  • 1. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implantation in early deafened, late implanted adults: Do they benefit?
    Kumar RS; Mawman D; Sankaran D; Melling C; O'Driscoll M; Freeman SM; Lloyd SK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():22-5. PubMed ID: 27099106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
    Zheng Y; Soli SD; Tao Y; Xu K; Meng Z; Li G; Wang K; Zheng H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1418-26. PubMed ID: 21893351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study of ceiling effect of commonly used Chinese recognition materials in post-lingual deafened patients with cochlear implant].
    Wang Y; Shi Y; Fu Y; Wang Q; Fu Y; Xi X
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 29(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 26121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients.
    Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Pisoni DB; Kirk KI
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Oct; 115(10):1887-94. PubMed ID: 16222216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implants for pre-lingually profoundly deaf adults.
    Craddock L; Cooper H; Riley A; Wright T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():26-30. PubMed ID: 27099107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the performance of post-lingually deafened patients with Nurotron(®) Venus™ cochlear implants.
    Li J; Ji F; Chen W; Zhao H; Han D; Yang S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 134(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 24720340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Zhang E; Coelho DH
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
    Moberly AC; Pisoni DB; Tamati TN
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The long-term results of speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users.
    Jolink C; Helleman HW; van Spronsen E; Ebbens FA; Ravesloot MJ; Dreschler WA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 May; 17(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 27078518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of technological advances on cochlear implant performance in adults.
    Lenarz M; Joseph G; Sönmez H; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2634-40. PubMed ID: 22109764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software.
    Smith L; Bartel L; Joglekar S; Chen J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e262-e267. PubMed ID: 28806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?
    Cullington HE; Aidi T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Mar; 18(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 28120703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With Severe Compared With Profound Hearing Loss.
    Birman CS; Sanli H
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e458-e463. PubMed ID: 32176130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
    Gifford RH; Shallop JK; Peterson AM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of pre-operative developmental delays on the speech perception of children with cochlear implants.
    Hiraumi H; Yamamoto N; Sakamoto T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Feb; 40(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22727355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.