BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26842429)

  • 1. A practical divergence measure for survival distributions that can be estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves.
    Cox TF; Czanner G
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(14):2406-21. PubMed ID: 26842429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Net Chance of a Longer Survival as a Patient-Oriented Measure of Treatment Benefit in Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Péron J; Roy P; Ozenne B; Roche L; Buyse M
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):901-5. PubMed ID: 27124210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of exposure distribution adjusting for association between exposure level and detection limit.
    Yang Y; Shelton BJ; Tucker TT; Li L; Kryscio R; Chen L
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2935-2946. PubMed ID: 28513091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A group sequential test for survival trials: an alternative to rank-based procedures.
    Li Z
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):277-83. PubMed ID: 11318168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Lueza B; Rotolo F; Bonastre J; Pignon JP; Michiels S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():37. PubMed ID: 27025706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A versatile test for equality of two survival functions based on weighted differences of Kaplan-Meier curves.
    Uno H; Tian L; Claggett B; Wei LJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3680-95. PubMed ID: 26194988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of gastric cancer survival: using an artificial hierarchical neural network.
    Amiri Z; Mohammad K; Mahmoudi M; Zeraati H; Fotouhi A
    Pak J Biol Sci; 2008 Apr; 11(8):1076-84. PubMed ID: 18819544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of survival distributions in clinical trials: A practical guidance.
    Chen X; Wang X; Chen K; Zheng Y; Chappell RJ; Dey J
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):507-521. PubMed ID: 32594788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.
    Díaz I; Colantuoni E; Hanley DF; Rosenblum M
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):439-468. PubMed ID: 29492746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.
    Horiguchi M; Hassett MJ; Uno H
    Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 17(6):597-606. PubMed ID: 32933339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilizing the integrated difference of two survival functions to quantify the treatment contrast for designing, monitoring, and analyzing a comparative clinical study.
    Zhao L; Tian L; Uno H; Solomon SD; Pfeffer MA; Schindler JS; Wei LJ
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 22914867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the restricted mean survival time with the hazard ratio in superiority trials with a time-to-event end point.
    Huang B; Kuan PF
    Pharm Stat; 2018 May; 17(3):202-213. PubMed ID: 29282880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of a decreasing hazard of patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    van Geloven N; Martin I; Damman P; de Winter RJ; Tijssen JG; Lopuhaä HP
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1223-38. PubMed ID: 22829475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regression models for the restricted residual mean life for right-censored and left-truncated data.
    Cortese G; Holmboe SA; Scheike TH
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1803-1822. PubMed ID: 28106926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ball divergence for the equality test of crossing survival curves.
    You N; He X; Dai H; Wang X
    Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(29):5353-5368. PubMed ID: 37752757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Median tests for censored survival data; a contingency table approach.
    Tang S; Jeong JH
    Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):983-9. PubMed ID: 23189327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designing therapeutic cancer vaccine trials with delayed treatment effect.
    Xu Z; Zhen B; Park Y; Zhu B
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):592-605. PubMed ID: 27807870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methods for estimating the attributable risk in the context of survival analysis.
    Gassama M; Bénichou J; Dartois L; Thiébaut AC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28114895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating efficacy in trials with selective crossover.
    Brentnall AR; Sasieni P; Cuzick J
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2333-2346. PubMed ID: 28295486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Late divergence of survival curves in cancer immunotherapy trials: interpretation and implications.
    Thorén FB; Anderson H; Strannegård Ö
    Cancer Immunol Immunother; 2013 Oct; 62(10):1547-51. PubMed ID: 23979447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.