These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26843090)

  • 21. [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].
    Mühler R; Ziese M; Rostalski D; Verhey JL
    HNO; 2014 Jan; 62(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24270967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of overlap-masking on binaural reverberant word intelligibility.
    Libbey B; Rogers PH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3141-51. PubMed ID: 15603159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A dissociation between speech understanding and perceived reverberation.
    Ellis GM; Zahorik P
    Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():52-58. PubMed ID: 31075611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. USING AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION AND SPEECH SYNTHESIS TO IMPROVE THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS IN REVERBERANT LISTENING ENVIRONMENTS.
    Chu K; Collins L; Mainsah B
    Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process; 2020 May; 2020():6929-6933. PubMed ID: 33078056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.
    Bent T; Buchwald A; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2660-9. PubMed ID: 19894843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhancement of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms: role of amplitude envelope and temporal fine structure.
    Srinivasan NK; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL239-45. PubMed ID: 24907828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time course of a perceptual enhancement effect for noise-masked speech in reverberant environments.
    Brandewie E; Zahorik P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL265-70. PubMed ID: 23927235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
    Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.
    Helms Tillery K; Brown CA; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 22280603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
    Nogueira W; Rode T; Büchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Talker intelligibility differences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Green T; Katiri S; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):EL223-9. PubMed ID: 17552573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. USING MACHINE LEARNING TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF REVERBERATION AND NOISE IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS.
    Chu KM; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM; Mainsah BO
    Proc Meet Acoust; 2018 May; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 32582407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.