These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26843235)
41. Extension of the ML-EM algorithm for dose estimation using PET in proton therapy: application to an inhomogeneous target. Masuda T; Nishio T; Sano A; Karasawa K Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(18):185001. PubMed ID: 32485687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Monte-Carlo simulations of clinically realistic respiratory gated (18)F-FDG PET: application to lesion detectability and volume measurements. Vauclin S; Michel C; Buvat I; Doyeux K; Edet-Sanson A; Vera P; Gardin I; Hapdey S Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Jan; 118(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 25459525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM. Reader AJ; Sureau FC; Comtat C; Trébossen R; Buvat I Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5455-74. PubMed ID: 17047263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical application of in vivo treatment delivery verification based on PET/CT imaging of positron activity induced at high energy photon therapy. Janek Strååt S; Andreassen B; Jonsson C; Noz ME; Maguire GQ; Näfstadius P; Näslund I; Schoenahl F; Brahme A Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(16):5541-53. PubMed ID: 23880661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Fast generation of 4D PET-MR data from real dynamic MR acquisitions. Tsoumpas C; Buerger C; King AP; Mollet P; Keereman V; Vandenberghe S; Schulz V; Schleyer P; Schaeffter T; Marsden PK Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(20):6597-613. PubMed ID: 21937775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of different methods of incorporating respiratory motion for lung cancer tumor volume delineation on PET images: a simulation study. Hatt M; Maitre AL; Wallach D; Fayad H; Visvikis D Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7409-30. PubMed ID: 23093372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bootstrap methods for estimating PET image noise: experimental validation and an application to evaluation of image reconstruction algorithms. Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Nakamura K; Yamaguchi H; Kinoshita T Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 28(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 24158790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. 4D PET iterative deconvolution with spatiotemporal regularization for quantitative dynamic PET imaging. Reilhac A; Charil A; Wimberley C; Angelis G; Hamze H; Callaghan P; Garcia MP; Boisson F; Ryder W; Meikle SR; Gregoire MC Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():484-93. PubMed ID: 26080302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. In vivo verification of proton beam path by using post-treatment PET/CT imaging. Hsi WC; Indelicato DJ; Vargas C; Duvvuri S; Li Z; Palta J Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4136-46. PubMed ID: 19810487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A Monte Carlo based three-dimensional dose reconstruction method derived from portal dose images. van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Schiffeleers RF; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P; Minken AW Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2426-34. PubMed ID: 16898445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fast and memory-efficient Monte Carlo-based image reconstruction for whole-body PET. Zhang L; Staelens S; Van Holen R; De Beenhouwer J; Verhaeghe J; Kawrakow I; Vandenberghe S Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3667-76. PubMed ID: 20831074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers. Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A method for accurate modelling of the crystal response function at a crystal sub-level applied to PET reconstruction. Stute S; Benoit D; Martineau A; Rehfeld NS; Buvat I Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(3):793-809. PubMed ID: 21239844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization. Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Simultaneous motion estimation and image reconstruction (SMEIR) for 4D cone-beam CT. Wang J; Gu X Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101912. PubMed ID: 24089914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction. Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cone beam CT imaging with limited angle of projections and prior knowledge for volumetric verification of non-coplanar beam radiation therapy: a proof of concept study. Meng B; Xing L; Han B; Koong A; Chang D; Cheng J; Li R Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(21):7777-89. PubMed ID: 24140954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Respiratory motion correction for PET oncology applications using affine transformation of list mode data. Lamare F; Cresson T; Savean J; Cheze Le Rest C; Reader AJ; Visvikis D Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 17183132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Scattered PET data for attenuation-map reconstruction in PET/MRI. Berker Y; Kiessling F; Schulz V Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102502. PubMed ID: 25281977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]